Clinical Attitudes Toward Tooth Preservation Versus Implant Therapy: Development and Preliminary Validation of a...

Background/Objectives: The clinical decision between preserving periodontally compromised teeth and replacing them with dental implants represents a complex clinical dilemma influenced by biological, prosthetic, economic, and professional factors. The aim of this pilot study was to develop and preliminarily validate a questionnaire designed to assess dentists' attitudes and therapeutic preferences regarding the use of periodontally compromised teeth as prosthetic abutments versus extraction and implant-supported rehabilitation. Methods: An observational cross-sectional study was conducted, among Romanian dentists, using a structured self-administered questionnaire consisting of 43 items organized into seven sections addressing clinical attitudes, decision-making factors, professional competence, prosthetic treatment preferences, and implant-related clinical practices. A total of 111 Romanian dentists completed the questionnaire. Responses were recorded using a five-point Likert scale. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics software. Internal consistency was evaluated using Cronbach's alpha coefficient and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Construct validity was assessed using exploratory factor analysis based on Principal Component Analysis with Varimax rotation. Results: The questionnaire demonstrated good internal consistency across most sections, with Cronbach's alpha values ranging between 0.795 and 0.859 after scale optimization. Item-total correlations indicated adequate contribution of individual items to overall scale reliability. Intraclass correlation coefficients confirmed moderate reliability for individual items and good reliability for average section scores. Exploratory factor analysis showed satisfactory sampling adequacy (KMO = 0.709) and statistically significant Bartlett's test of sphericity (p < 0.001), supporting the suitability of the data for factor analysis. The sample population was predominantly composed of early-career dentists with limited clinical experience, which should be considered when interpreting the findings. Conclusions: The developed questionnaire demonstrated satisfactory psychometric properties, including good internal consistency and acceptable construct validity, supporting its use as a research instrument for assessing Romanian dentists' self-reported attitudes, therapeutic preferences, and perception-based decision patterns regarding the preservation of periodontally compromised teeth and implant-supported prosthetic rehabilitation.