Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 14, 2026

06:41
A Minimally Invasive Model to Analyze Endochondral Fracture Healing in Mice Under Standardized Biomechanical Conditions
Published on: March 22, 2018
Intramedullary Headless Screw Feasibility for Anatomical Reduction in II-V Metacarpal Fractures: A CT-Based
Pelin İsmailoğlu1, Cengiz Kazdal2, Emrehan Uysal3
1Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Recep Tayyip Erdogan University, 53020 Rize, Turkey.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
|May 13, 2026
Summary
Intramedullary headless screw fixation for metacarpal fractures is limited by canal size. The fourth metacarpal is most restrictive, necessitating CT-based templating for optimal screw selection and reduced risks.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic Surgery
- Biomedical Engineering
- Radiology
Background:
- Intramedullary headless screw (IMHS) fixation offers a minimally invasive and stable approach for metacarpal fractures.
- However, the narrow intramedullary canal morphology can limit the suitability of standard screw sizes.
- Understanding metacarpal isthmus dimensions is crucial for successful IMHS application.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the isthmus morphology of the second to fifth metacarpals using CT-based analysis.
- To assess the anatomical feasibility of various IMHS diameters within these canals.
- To determine the impact of age and gender on metacarpal canal dimensions.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 75 hand CT scans (300 metacarpals).
- 3D reconstructions and serial axial CT analysis to identify and measure isthmus diameters.
- Virtual screw implantation simulation to calculate feasibility rates for screw diameters from 2.75 mm to 4.00 mm.
Main Results:
- The fourth metacarpal exhibited the smallest mean isthmus diameter (2.64 mm), while the fifth was largest (3.21 mm).
- Screw feasibility decreased with increasing diameter; the fourth metacarpal showed low compatibility (e.g., 4.0% for 4.0 mm screws).
- Positive correlation between age and isthmus diameter in the second and third metacarpals was observed.
Conclusions:
- Metacarpal isthmus morphology significantly impacts IMHS fixation feasibility.
- The fourth metacarpal presents anatomical challenges, especially for larger screws (≥ 3.5 mm).
- Individualized, CT-based preoperative templating is recommended over standardized implant selection to optimize screw fit and minimize cortical compromise.
Keywords:
metacarpal headless screwmetacarpal intramedullary canalmorphometric analysisvirtual simulation
