Safety and Efficiency of Various Pancreatic Enucleation Procedures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Deqiang Zhou1, Feng Tan1, Zihe Wang1

  • 1Division of Pancreatic Surgery, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37 Guoxue Alley, Chengdu 610041, China.

Insights

Minimally invasive pancreatic enucleation (MI-pEn) offers reduced operation time, blood loss, and hospital stay compared to open surgery, without increasing complications. Robotic and laparoscopic approaches show similar short-term outcomes for pancreatic enucleation.

Area of Science:

  • Gastroenterology and Hepatology
  • Surgical Oncology
  • Minimally Invasive Surgery

Background:

  • Pancreatic enucleation is a key procedure for benign or borderline malignant pancreatic neoplasms.
  • Minimally invasive pancreatic enucleation (MI-pEn), encompassing laparoscopic and robotic approaches, is increasingly adopted.
  • Direct comparisons of short-term outcomes between MI-pEn and open pancreatic enucleation (O-pEn) are crucial for clinical decision-making.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically compare the short-term outcomes of minimally invasive pancreatic enucleation (MI-pEn) versus open pancreatic enucleation (O-pEn).
  • To evaluate the comparative effectiveness of laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted pancreatic enucleation.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic literature search of PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science (1990-2025).
  • Meta-analysis of 13 comparative studies (463 MI-pEn, 547 O-pEn) following PRISMA guidelines.
  • Utilized RevMan 5.4.1 and R 4.3.0 for statistical analysis.

Main Results:

  • No significant difference in clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) between MI-pEn and O-pEn (OR = 0.78; p = 0.12).
  • MI-pEn demonstrated significantly reduced operation time (p = 0.01), blood loss (p < 0.00001), hospital stay (p = 0.001), and wound infection (p = 0.03).
  • Laparoscopic and robotic enucleation showed comparable short-term outcomes.

Conclusions:

  • Minimally invasive pancreatic enucleation is safe, feasible, and offers significant advantages in operative efficiency and patient recovery.
  • MI-pEn does not increase postoperative complications compared to open procedures.
  • Robotic and laparoscopic pancreatic enucleation yield similar short-term results, with further research needed on robotic surgery's potential CR-POPF benefits.