Related Experiment Videos
Association Between Heart Failure Ejection Fraction Phenotypes and Contrast-Associated Acute Kidney Injury: A
Kaandeeban Mohanraj1, John Amerson2, Naveen Punchayil Narayanankutty2
1Internal Medicine, Indira Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute, Puducherry, IND.
Insights
Contrast-associated acute kidney injury (CA-AKI) risk varies among heart failure (HF) types. Current evidence is limited, suggesting ejection fraction alone may not fully indicate kidney vulnerability in HF patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Nephrology
- Clinical Research
Background:
- Contrast-associated acute kidney injury (CA-AKI) is a known complication, particularly in heart failure (HF) patients.
- The varying risk of CA-AKI across different heart failure phenotypes, stratified by left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), remains unclear.
- Existing data comparing CA-AKI risk among heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF), and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is limited and inconsistent.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review and synthesize evidence on the risk of CA-AKI stratified by LVEF phenotypes in patients with heart failure.
- To evaluate the association between HFrEF, HFmrEF, and HFpEF and the incidence of CA-AKI.
Main Methods:
- A systematic literature search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science from January 1, 2011, to December 11, 2025.
- Two observational cohort studies, including 3,499 patients with HF, met the eligibility criteria.
- Due to heterogeneity and limited data, a narrative synthesis of adjusted effect estimates was performed, with risk of bias assessed using ROBINS-E.
Main Results:
- The two included studies reported multivariable-adjusted odds ratios for CA-AKI across HF phenotypes.
- One study found no significant association between reduced EF and CA-AKI after adjustment (HFrEF vs. HFpEF adjusted OR 1.01; HFmrEF vs. HFpEF adjusted OR 1.31).
- Another study suggested higher adjusted odds of CA-AKI with HFrEF compared to other phenotypes (adjusted OR 0.85).
Conclusions:
- Current evidence on CA-AKI risk stratified by LVEF in HF patients is limited to two observational studies with inconsistent findings.
- Pooled effect estimates could not be reported due to heterogeneity in study design, populations, and covariate adjustment.
- Ejection fraction alone may not fully capture kidney vulnerability in HF patients, and further larger studies are needed to clarify these risks.
Abstract:
Contrast-associated acute kidney injury (CA-AKI) is more common in patients with heart failure (HF). Stratified by left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), the effect of disease severity is still unknown. There is little and inconsistent data comparing the risk of CA-AKI among the various forms of HF identified by the latest guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science (January 1, 2011 - December 11, 2025) for studies reporting CA-AKI outcomes stratified by LVEF phenotypes (heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF), and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF)) was performed. We planned a meta-analysis, but due to heterogeneity in adjusted models and limited study data available, we present a narrative synthesis of adjusted effect estimates. Risk of bias was assessed using Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies - of Exposures (ROBINS-E). Two observational cohort studies comprising 3,499 patients with HF met the eligibility criteria. Both studies reported multivariable-adjusted odds ratios. One study found no significant association between reduced ejection fraction (EF) and CA-AKI after adjustment (HFrEF vs. HFpEF adjusted OR 1.01, 95% CI 0.69-1.74; HFmrEF vs. HFpEF adjusted OR 1.31, 95% CI 0.87-1.96). Another study reported adjusted estimates suggesting higher odds with HFrEF compared with other phenotypes (reported adjusted OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.73-0.98 for phenotype-level comparisons). Because of the differences in study design, populations, and covariate adjustment, we did not pool estimates quantitatively; instead, we describe the findings narratively. Current evidence is limited to two observational cohorts and yields inconsistent adjusted estimates. Therefore, pooled effect estimates weren't reported. The findings suggest that EF alone may not fully reflect kidney vulnerability. Due to the limited number of observational studies, these findings should be interpreted with caution, highlighting the need for larger studies in the future.
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
Pathophysiology of Heart Failure
Acute Kidney Injury II: Pathophysiology
Acute Kidney Injury IV: Diagnostic Studies and Prevention
Acute Kidney Injury I: Introduction
Heart Failure Drugs: Inhibitors of Renin-Angiotensin System