Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 14, 2026

Mechanical and Controlled PRP Injections in Patients Affected by Androgenetic Alopecia
Published on: January 27, 2018
The Efficacy of Growth Factor Injection in Androgenic Alopecia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Azhar Alali1, Mohammed Alahmadi2, Ghazal Alsisi1
1Department of Dermatology, King Fahad General Hospital, Medina, Saudi Arabia.
Background:
Androgenetic alopecia (AGA) is the most common cause of hair loss, and current pharmacotherapies have limitations. Autologous platelet-derived therapies, including PRP, its standardized derivative PRGF, and other growth factor concentrates (GFC), have emerged as regenerative options, but differences in preparation and mixed clinical evidence remain.
Methodology:
Following PRISMA guidelines, seven databases were searched for randomized and non-randomized studies on intralesional growth factor injections for AGA. Outcomes included hair density, thickness, satisfaction, and adverse events, with quality assessed using RoB2, MINORS, and MMS tools.
Results:
Twelve studies (745 patients) were included. GFC showed progressive hair density gains from 19.6 hairs/cm2 at 1 month to 57.1 at 12 months, while PRP increased density by 34.4 at 6 months and 42.0 at 12 months. GFC also improved thickness (5.19-22.03 µm) with 94.3% patient satisfaction. Adverse events were mild, but RCTs had a high risk of bias, and non-randomized studies showed serious to critical bias.
Conclusion:
Autologous growth factor injections appear safe and improve hair density, thickness, and patient satisfaction over 12 months, especially with newer concentrates. However, high risk of bias, substantial heterogeneity (I2 > 90%), and non-standardized protocols limit the evidence, making findings hypothesis-generating until larger, standardized, double-blind trials with long-term follow-up are conducted.
Level Of Evidence Iii:
This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
