Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 15, 2026

E-Patient Counseling Trial (E-PACO): Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
Understanding the information-seeking behaviors and office visit communication experiences of patients with breast
Ilona Fridman1, Maame Duah2, Diya Vemuganti2
1Center for Discovery and Innovation, Hackensack Meridian Health, Nutley, NJ, United States; Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine, Nutley, NJ, United States; Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington DC, United States.
Background:
A cancer diagnosis often requires patients to navigate complex health information, balancing clinical advice with often-conflicting input from family, friends, and the media. We draw on patients' lived experiences and examine information-seeking behaviors, patient-provider communication, and patient decisions to identify the communication strategies between patients and providers that either support or hinder patients' informed decision-making.
Methods:
We conducted interviews with people diagnosed with breast or prostate cancer at two large health systems in New Jersey and Washington, DC, between November 2024 and February 2025. Interview guides were informed by the Coping in Deliberation (CODE) (Witt et al., 2012). framework and Shared Decision-Making (Elwyn et al., 2012). Interview transcripts were inductively double-coded, and emergent codes were subsequently organized deductively into themes. Themes were refined with input from communication and oncology experts, and organized into a framework to support informed decisions.
Results:
A total of 9 patients with breast and 10 with prostate cancer participated. We synthesized the experiences of patients who searched for information in nonclinical sources, including information about complementary and alternative cancer therapy (CAM). The developed framework outlines five main themes: "Post-Visit Unmet Patient Needs," "Exposure to Conflicting Information," "Supportive Communication," "Unsupportive Communication," and "Risk of Misinformed Decision Making." The framework builds on the deliberation phase of decision-making and captures how patients seek answers to unmet information needs outside clinical settings, encounter conflicting information, and experience supportive or unsupportive clinical communication as they make medical decisions.
Conclusion:
While future research is needed to test the relationships proposed in the framework, the framework clarifies how patients seek and navigate information outside the clinical setting and how they experience patient-provider communication as either supportive or unsupportive of informed decision-making.
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Survival Analysis
Nursing Ethical Principles II
Consider the following scenario, which illustrates how these principles are applied in the care of Mr. John, a fifty-year-old teacher diagnosed with metastatic liver cancer.
Initially, Mr. John's cancer...
Cancer Prevention
Some...
Cancer Prevention
Some...
Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching I: Assessment and Diagnosis
It is critical to determine the patient's learning needs during the assessment. Determination of learning needs compounds data from the...
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
