Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 15, 2026

Cox-Maze IV Procedure Concomitant with Valvular Surgery In Situs Inversus Dextrocardia: A Single-Center Experience in China
Published on: February 11, 2022
Eleven-Year Experience and Early Outcomes of Pericardiectomy for Constrictive Pericarditis
Christopher Gaisendrees1, Llija Djordjevic2, Geor Schlachtenberger1
1Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Insights
Surgical pericardiectomy for constrictive pericarditis is feasible in high-risk patients, showing acceptable early outcomes. An individualized approach with extensive pericardial resection and selective cardiopulmonary bypass use is effective for advanced disease.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Thoracic Surgery
- Cardiac Surgery
Background:
- Constrictive pericarditis is the advanced stage of chronic pericardial inflammation, leading to diastolic dysfunction and right-sided heart failure.
- Pericardiectomy is the definitive treatment, but carries significant perioperative risks, especially in patients with severe disease.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the perioperative characteristics and early outcomes of surgical pericardiectomy for constrictive pericarditis.
- To assess the feasibility and safety of pericardiectomy in a high-risk patient cohort.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective single-center cohort study of 47 patients undergoing pericardiectomy for constrictive pericarditis (2010-2021).
- Analysis of perioperative data, surgical strategies (median sternotomy, radical pericardiectomy, beating-heart vs. cardiopulmonary bypass), and early outcomes (30-day mortality, morbidity, length of stay).
Main Results:
- The study included 47 patients (64% male, mean age 58 years), with 65% in NYHA class III-IV and elevated operative risk scores (EuroSCORE II, STS).
- Median sternotomy (94%) and radical pericardiectomy (64%) were common. A beating-heart strategy was used in 79%, with cardiopulmonary bypass in 21%.
- 30-day mortality was 6%. Major complications included sepsis (13%) and renal failure requiring dialysis (8.5%). Mean ICU and hospital stays were 3.7 and 11 days, respectively.
Conclusions:
- Pericardiectomy for constrictive pericarditis can be performed with acceptable early mortality and morbidity, even in high-risk populations.
- An individualized surgical strategy, emphasizing extensive pericardial resection and selective cardiopulmonary bypass, is feasible and effective for managing advanced constrictive pericarditis in experienced centers.
Background:
Constrictive pericarditis represents the end stage of chronic pericardial inflammation and is characterized by impaired diastolic filling due to pericardial fibrosis and/or calcification, leading to progressive right-sided heart failure. Pericardiectomy remains the definitive treatment, yet perioperative risk remains substantial in patients with advanced disease.
Methods:
We performed a retrospective single-center cohort study of 47 consecutive patients undergoing surgical pericardiectomy for constrictive pericarditis between January 2010 and December 2021. Perioperative characteristics, operative strategy, and early outcomes, including 30-day mortality, postoperative morbidity, and length of stay, were assessed.
Results:
Mean age was 58 ± 14 years, and 64% of patients were male (n = 30). In the study 65% of patients presented with NYHA functional class III to IV, and operative risk was elevated, with a mean EuroSCORE II of 8.5 ± 2.3 and a mean STS score of 9.4 ± 2.3. Median sternotomy was used in 94% of patients (n = 44), radical pericardiectomy in 64% (n = 30), and a beating-heart strategy without cardiopulmonary bypass in 79% (n = 37), whereas cardiopulmonary bypass was required in 21% (n = 10). We found 30-day all-cause mortality was 6% (n = 3). Major postoperative complications included sepsis in 13% (n = 6) and renal failure requiring dialysis in 8.5% (n = 4). Mean ICU stay was 3.7 ± 4.5 days, and mean total hospital stay was 11 ± 6.7 days.
Conclusion:
Pericardiectomy for constrictive pericarditis can be performed with acceptable early mortality and morbidity even in a high-risk population. In experienced centers, an individualized surgical strategy prioritizing extensive pericardial resection with selective use of cardiopulmonary bypass appears feasible for the management of advanced disease.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Pericarditis III: Medical Management
Pericarditis II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Pericarditis I: Introduction
Cardiomyopathy VII: Pre and Post Operative Nursing Management
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Pericarditis IV: Nursing Management

