Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 15, 2026

Benefits of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in an Asynchronous Heart Failure Model Induced by Left Bundle Branch Ablation and Rapid Pacing
Published on: December 11, 2017
Cardiac magnetic resonance-derived left atrioventricular coupling index predicts outcome in reduced ejection fraction
Marco Guglielmo1,2, Damiano Fedele3,4, Luca Bergamaschi3,4
1Department of Cardiology, Division of Heart and Lungs, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Insights
The cardiac magnetic resonance-derived left atrioventricular coupling index (LACI) independently predicts mortality and heart failure in patients with reduced ejection fraction. An LACI of ≥21% identifies higher-risk individuals, aiding clinical risk stratification.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Imaging
- Biomarkers
Background:
- The left atrioventricular coupling index (LACI) shows prognostic potential in various clinical contexts.
- Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) is a key imaging modality for cardiovascular assessment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the prognostic capability of CMR-derived LACI in patients diagnosed with heart failure (HF) and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF).
Main Methods:
- Utilized data from the DERIVATE registry, including patients with LVEF <50% who underwent CMR.
- Calculated LACI as the ratio of left atrial to left ventricular end-diastolic volumes.
- Employed Cox regression and competing-risk analysis to predict all-cause mortality (ACM), ACM or HF, and HF, with time-dependent ROC analysis for optimal cutoffs.
Main Results:
- Included 2170 patients (mean LVEF 31.6±11.3%); median follow-up was 1016 days.
- Each 5% increase in LACI independently predicted higher risks of ACM, ACM or HF, and HF after multivariable adjustment (p<0.016 for ACM, p<0.001 for others).
- An optimal LACI cutoff of ≥21% identified patients at significantly higher risk for adverse outcomes (log-rank p<0.001).
Conclusions:
- CMR-derived LACI serves as an independent predictor of ACM and HF in patients with reduced LVEF.
- LACI offers incremental prognostic value beyond established markers like LVEF and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE).
- A LACI cutoff of ≥21% effectively identifies high-risk patients, potentially improving clinical risk stratification strategies.
Introduction:
The left atrioventricular coupling index (LACI) has emerged as a potential prognostic marker in several clinical settings. This study evaluated the prognostic value of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR)-derived LACI in patients with heart failure (HF) and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF).
Methods:
Patients from the multicentre DERIVATE registry with LVEF <50% who underwent CMR were included. LACI was calculated as the ratio between left atrial and left ventricular end-diastolic volumes. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression models estimated hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for predicting all-cause mortality (ACM), ACM or HF, and HF alone (competing-risk analysis). Time-dependent receiver operating characteristic analysis identified optimal cut-offs for 3-year outcomes.
Results:
A total of 2170 patients were included (mean age 59.8 ± 13.9 years; 24.7% women; mean LVEF 31.6 ± 11.3%). Median follow-up was 1016 days (580-1609). Median LACI was 19.4% (13.3-28.8). During follow-up, ACM occurred in 191 patients (8.8%), ACM or HF in 565 (26.0%), and HF in 442 (20.4%). After adjustment for clinical and CMR parameters, including LVEF and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE), each 5% increase in LACI was associated with higher risk of ACM (HR 1.06, 95% CI 1.01-1.11; P = .016), ACM or HF (HR 1.09, 95% CI 1.06-1.12; P < .001), and HF (HR 1.09, 95% CI 1.05-1.12; P < .001). The optimal cut-off for ACM was LACI ≥21% (AUC 0.617, 95% CI 0.561-0.673), identifying patients at higher risk of ACM, ACM or HF, and HF (log-rank P < .001 for all).
Conclusion:
CMR-derived LACI independently predicts ACM and HF in patients with reduced LVEF and provides incremental prognostic value beyond LVEF and LGE. A cut-off of ≥21% identifies higher-risk patients and may support clinical risk stratification.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Mitral Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests