Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 15, 2026

Development of a Virtual Reality Assessment of Everyday Living Skills
Published on: April 23, 2014
Longitudinal Validation of the RADAR Score in Primary Care: Prognostic Value for Exacerbations and Short-term Changes
Myriam Calle Rubio1, Soha Esmaili2, Imán Esmaili3
1Pulmonology Department, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos (IdISSC), Madrid, Spain; Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Spain; CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Madrid, Spain.
Introduction:
The longitudinal validity of the RADAR score for predicting short-term risk in primary care remains unestablished. We aimed to evaluate its prognostic performance for adverse events and to describe short-term changes in control status and patient-reported health status in a real-world prospective cohort.
Methods:
In this multicenter study, 706 primary care patients with COPD receiving maintenance triple therapy were assessed at baseline and after a median follow-up of 91 days. We analyzed the association between baseline RADAR control status (≥4 vs <4) and 3-month outcomes (all-cause mortality, severe exacerbations, moderate exacerbations, and composite events). We also described 3-month changes in RADAR score (ΔRADAR) and COPD Assessment Test score (ΔCAT).
Results:
Baseline poor control (RADAR ≥4) was strongly associated with severe exacerbations (16.2% vs 4.9%; OR, 3.75) and composite events (33.8% vs 22.9%; OR, 1.72). No significant difference was observed for moderate exacerbations (18.0% vs 18.9%). However, when modeled as a frequency count, each 1-point increase in RADAR score was associated with a 21% higher rate of moderate exacerbations (incidence rate ratio, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.15-1.27; P<.001). Patients with RADAR ≥4 exhibited a high-risk profile characterized by worse airflow limitation, active smoking, higher symptom burden, and poorer adherence. Over 3 months, significant changes were observed in the distributions of both ΔCAT and ΔRADAR when analyzed by clinical phenotype and risk level.
Conclusions:
The RADAR score effectively predicts short-term clinical risk in primary care and provides a practical tool for monitoring COPD and guiding clinical decision-making. It demonstrates significant prognostic value for identifying patients at high short-term risk of severe exacerbations and serves as an initial risk stratification tool to identify individuals requiring further assessment. The observed short-term changes highlight the dynamic nature of COPD control.
Related Concept Videos
Rheumatic Heart Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Rheumatic Heart Disease IV: Nursing Management
Assessment of apical radial pulse
The A-R pulse assessment involves simultaneous evaluation of the apical and radial pulses. When the apical and radial pulse rates vary, this assessment helps identify a pulse deficit.
Pre-Procedural Preparation
Respiratory Assessment: Purpose and Indications
Objectives and Importance:
The primary goal of respiratory assessment is to evaluate patients at early risk of clinical deterioration. Since respiratory distress often precedes other signs of declining health, breathing patterns and sounds become a...
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-IV: Assessement and Diagnostic Studies
Medical History
