Association between postnatal anthropometric growth by term and high-performing neurodevelopment at age 3 years in

Takashi Maeda1,2, Yoshihiro Tanahashi3,4, Hideyuki Asada5,6

  • 1Division of Neonatology, Center for Maternal-Neonatal Care, Nagoya University Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.

Insights

Postnatal body length growth by 40 weeks postmenstrual age (PMA) is linked to better neurodevelopment in extremely preterm infants. Weight and earlier growth changes were not significant predictors.

Area of Science:

  • Neonatalogy
  • Developmental Pediatrics
  • Pediatric Neurology

Background:

  • Extremely preterm infants (<28 weeks gestational age) face risks for neurodevelopmental impairments.
  • Postnatal growth is crucial for optimizing outcomes in this vulnerable population.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the association between postnatal growth parameters and high-performing neurodevelopment at age 3 in extremely preterm infants.
  • To identify specific growth metrics that predict optimal neurodevelopmental outcomes.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of 287 infants born at <28 weeks gestational age.
  • Anthropometric Z-scores (length, weight, head circumference) assessed at 32, 36, and 40 weeks postmenstrual age (PMA).
  • Neurodevelopmental outcomes at age 3 categorized into four groups: delay, subnormal, normal, and high-performing.

Main Results:

  • Body length at 40 weeks PMA showed a significant association with high-performing neurodevelopment (aOR=1.86).
  • Head circumference at 40 weeks PMA was also associated with high-performing neurodevelopment (aOR=1.32).
  • Growth in body length Z-scores from 36 to 40 weeks PMA predicted high-performing neurodevelopment; body weight and earlier growth changes did not.

Conclusions:

  • Body length growth by 40 weeks PMA is an independent predictor of high-performing neurodevelopment at age 3 in extremely preterm infants.
  • Focusing on length growth in late preterm infancy may be important for optimizing neurodevelopmental trajectories.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos

Nature and Nurture01:10

Nature and Nurture

Many human characteristics, like height, are shaped by both nature—in other words, by our genes—and by nurture, or our environment. For example, chronic stress during childhood inhibits the production of growth hormones and consequently reduces bone growth and height. Scientists estimate that 70-90% of variation in height is due to genetic differences among individuals, and 10-30% of variation in height is due to differences in the environments that individuals experience, such as differences...
Three Developmental Domains01:29

Three Developmental Domains

Human development is typically examined across three main domains: physical, cognitive, and socio-emotional. These domains represent the significant areas of change and continuity throughout the lifespan, from infancy to late adulthood.
Physical Development
Physical processes, also known as maturation, encompass the biological changes that occur across an individual's life. These changes begin with genetic inheritance and continue through various stages, including growth in height and weight,...
Environmental Influences on Intelligence01:29

Environmental Influences on Intelligence

Despite the strong genetic influence on traits like intelligence, environmental factors significantly shape outcomes. For example, while over 90% of height variation is due to genetic differences, environmental factors such as nutrition also have a notable impact. Similarly, for intelligence, changes in a child's surroundings can significantly alter their IQ. Research shows that enriched environments boost children's academic success and help them develop key cognitive skills. Children from...
Biological Influences on Intelligence01:30

Biological Influences on Intelligence

Intelligence is often thought to be linked to brain size, but the relationship is more complex than that. While brain size does correlate modestly with some abilities, like verbal skills, the connection is weaker for others, such as spatial reasoning. Other factors, like brain structure, also play crucial roles. For instance, despite Einstein's smaller-than-average brain, his parietal cortex, which is involved in spatial reasoning, was 15% wider, suggesting that neural density might matter more...