Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 15, 2026
The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
Published on: February 19, 2021
Implementation of safety management systems (SMS) in healthcare: a systematic review and international comparison
Siân de Bell1, Zhivko Zhelev2, Alison Bethel2
1Exeter HSDR Evidence Synthesis Centre, Department of Health & Community Sciences, University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK s.c.de-bell@exeter.ac.uk.
Objectives:
Many industries where safety is a priority (eg, aviation) use safety management systems (SMSs), but evidence on their use in healthcare is needed to determine whether they could support patient safety improvement. We investigated the application of national-level SMSs to patient safety in terms of effectiveness, implementation and experience.
Design:
Systematic review using a case study approach.
Data Sources:
We identified patient safety organisations in each country and searched their websites. We also searched MEDLINE (in December 2023) and Embase (via Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCO) and Web of Science (in February 2024).
Eligibility Criteria:
Any evidence from five high-income countries that have publicly funded healthcare systems with universal coverage: Australia, Canada, Ireland, New Zealand and the Netherlands. We included publications on the effectiveness, implementation or experience of the patient safety approach in each country.
Data Extraction And Synthesis:
Included evidence was summarised and mapped onto an initial analytical framework based on analysis of SMSs in high-risk industries, enabling cross-country comparisons. Drafts were shared with experts from patient safety organisations in each country for comment. Formal quality appraisal was not possible as most evidence was non-evaluative.
Results:
53 publications were included, from Australia (5), Canada (7), Ireland (8), New Zealand (9) and the Netherlands (24). Only the Netherlands implemented a patient safety programme explicitly based on an SMS approach. Some aspects of patient safety in hospitals improved as a result, but there was significant variation in both the implementation of the programme and attributed outcomes.In the other four countries, the main components of an SMS were identified to some extent, along with evidence that their patient safety approaches had been influenced by concepts from high-risk industries and 'safety science' more widely.
Conclusions:
Emerging ideas from high-risk industries (beyond SMSs) and broader safety science have influenced all countries, reflecting increasing awareness of the need for initiatives to be context-specific to be successful. However, their implementation and impact need further evaluation.
Prospero Registration Number:
CRD42023487512.
Related Concept Videos
01:20Integrated Healthcare System
01:22Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
01:30Health Information Technology and Healthcare Information System
Health Information Technology, commonly called HIT, integrates advanced information systems and technology in healthcare settings. Its primary functions include:
01:26Methods Of Healthcare Delivery System
Managed Care System:
The managed care system is designed to control the cost while maintaining the quality of care. The patient's care from admission to discharge is planned by the primary care provider or the case manager, also known as the gatekeeper. In a managed care system, the number of care providers is limited...
01:14SBAR II: Application of SBAR
SBAR Report from a Nurse to a Health Care Provider
S: "Hello, Dr. Smith. This is Jane, RN, from the Med Surg unit. I am calling to tell you about Ms. White in Room 210, who is experiencing increased pain and redness at her incision site. Her recent...
01:29SBAR I: Understanding the Concept
Standardized methods of communication have been developed to ensure that information is...