Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 15, 2026

Analyzing Protein Architectures and Protein-Ligand Complexes by Integrative Structural Mass Spectrometry
Published on: October 15, 2018
Improving Protein Structure Prediction Using Integrative Cryo-EM and Ion Mobility Mass Spectrometry Modeling
Jacob B Howard1, Akshaya Narayanasamy2, Steffen Lindert2
1Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210, United States.
None:
Proteins play essential roles in cellular processes, and accurate three-dimensional structures are critical for understanding function and enabling drug discovery. High-resolution methods such as cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) and X-ray crystallography can provide detailed structural information. However, many proteins are characterized only by low-resolution or sparse data, which are difficult to translate into accurate atomic models. Mass spectrometry-based approaches such as ion mobility (IM-MS) provide global structural information through collisional cross section (CCS) but lack atomistic detail. Here, we present CRIM (cryo-EM + IM-MS), an integrative Rosetta scoring function that combines low-resolution cryo-EM density with IM-MS-derived CCS restraints to improve monomeric protein structure prediction. CRIM integrates the REF2015 energy with CCS agreement (via PARCS) and an electron density term (elec_dens_fast). On an ideal data set of 60 proteins, CRIM reduced the mean RMSD from 3.65 to 2.90 Å and increased the TM-score from 0.88 to 0.90. On an experimental data set of 54 proteins, CRIM improved model selection, lowering the RMSD from 6.65 to 4.38 Å and increasing the TM-score from 0.73 to 0.79. Compared to AlphaFold3, CRIM produced competitive predictions and outperformed it for select challenging targets where sparse experimental data provide strong constraints. The CRIM score function is freely available within Rosetta and provides a practical framework for integrating complementary cryo-EM and IM-MS data to improve protein structure prediction.
