Related Experiment Videos
Optimal Dose of Lorundrostat in Uncontrolled Hypertension: A Dose Response Meta-Analysis
Omar Abdullah Gill1, Miguel Leonardo Salcedo Monterrubio2, Ayeman Rashid3
1Department of Cardiology, King Edward Medical University, Lahore, Pakistan.
Background:
Lorundrostat, an aldosterone synthase inhibitor, shows promise for hypertension management, though optimal dosing strategies remain poorly defined.
Aims:
To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and dose-response effects of Lorundrostat to identify the optimal therapeutic dose.
Methods:
We searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and ClinicalTrials.gov systematically for relevant RCTs. Using a random-effects model, data were pooled to calculate mean differences (MD) and risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Dose-response modeling was performed using "dosresmeta" and "rcs" packages in R (v4.4.3).
Results:
Three RCTs (n=1568) were included. Lorundrostat significantly reduced systolic BP at 4-8 weeks (MD: -7.66 mmHg, 95% CI: -10.42 to -4.89) and 12 weeks (MD: -10.19 mmHg, 95% CI: -13.57 to -6.82). Diastolic BP also decreased significantly (MD: -3.81). Sub-group analysis based on background medication count showed no significant differences (P=0.80). Aldosterone levels were significantly reduced (MD: -4.39). Dose-response modeling identified 60 mg as the optimal dose, with diminishing returns thereafter. While hyperkalemia risk increased (RR: 3.19), no significant differences were found in serious adverse events.
Conclusion:
Lorundrostat effectively lowers BP with a manageable safety profile. The modeling-based insights suggest 60 mg as the optimal dose, delineating a clearer therapeutic window.
Related Concept Videos
Dose-Response Relationship: Potency and Efficacy
Dose-Response Relationship: Overview
Drug Dosing in Renal Diseases: Dose Adjustments Based on Drug Clearance and Elimination Rate Constant
Hypertension IV: Drug Therapy and Lifestyle Modifications
Hypertension III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Dose Response Curve: Conventional Versus Nonmonotonic