Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 15, 2026

Using a Murine Model of Psychosocial Stress in Pregnancy as a Translationally Relevant Paradigm for Psychiatric Disorders in Mothers and Infants
Published on: June 13, 2021
Association between gestational weight gain and adverse pregnancy outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Xiaohong Ye1, Peishan Li1, Chuan Shi1
1Obstetrics, Chengdu Shuangliu District Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Chengdu City, Sichuan Province, China.
Background:
Abnormal gestational weight gain (GWG) has been associated with a wide range of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes; however, existing evidence remains inconsistent, particularly across different regions and levels of national development. Moreover, the applicability of commonly used GWG guidelines in diverse populations, especially in developing countries, remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to comprehensively evaluate the association between abnormal GWG and adverse pregnancy outcomes using multinational cohort data.
Methods:
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies published from 2009 to April 2025. Studies defining GWG by IOM/WHO/ACOG guidelines and reporting outcomes like cesarean section, preterm birth, preeclampsia, macrosomia, or LGA/SGA were included. Data extraction and quality assessment (via NOS) were performed independently by reviewers. Pooled ORs with 95% CIs were calculated using fixed/random-effects models in Stata.
Results:
Seventeen studies involving 866,593 pregnant women were included. Compared with adequate GWG, excessive GWG was associated with significantly increased risks of cesarean section (OR = 1.32, 95% CI: 1.23-1.42), preeclampsia (OR = 2.05, 95% CI: 1.67-2.52), macrosomia (OR = 2.18, 95% CI: 2.03-2.35), and LGA (OR = 2.20, 95% CI: 1.97-2.46), while no significant association was observed with preterm birth or SGA. In contrast, inadequate GWG was associated with an increased risk of preterm birth (OR = 1.45, 95% CI: 1.08-1.94) but lower risks of cesarean section (OR = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.82-0.98), macrosomia (OR = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.55-0.91), and LGA (OR = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.56-0.75). Substantial regional and developmental differences were observed, with stronger associations generally found in developing countries.
Conclusion:
Our findings highlight that the effects of abnormal GWG are highly context-dependent, varying substantially by region, national development level, and guideline standards. These results underscore the need for population-specific GWG recommendations and targeted gestational weight management strategies, particularly in developing countries.
Related Concept Videos
Pathophysiology of Diabetes
Type 1 diabetes is characterized by autoimmune-mediated destruction of pancreatic β cells, with environmental factors potentially triggering this process in genetically susceptible individuals. Despite many not having a family history, certain genes increase susceptibility, suggesting a...
Diabetes Mellitus: Type 2 and Gestational
Teratogenicity
Regression Toward the Mean
Genome-wide Association Studies-GWAS
GWAS does not require the identification of the target gene involved in...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
