Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 15, 2026
07:50
A Metadata Extraction Approach for Clinical Case Reports to Enable Advanced Understanding of Biomedical Concepts
Published on: September 20, 2018
Correction to: 9 papers to add missing data availability statements
Oxford Open Immunology
|May 14, 2026
Summary
This study corrects previously published article DOIs. These corrections ensure accurate citation and retrieval of scientific literature, improving research integrity.
Area of Science:
- Scientific Publishing
- Bibliometrics
- Scholarly Communication
Background:
- Accurate Digital Object Identifiers (DOIs) are crucial for the reliable retrieval of scientific publications.
- Errors in DOIs can hinder access to research and impact citation tracking.
- Maintaining the integrity of the scientific record is essential for academic progress.
Purpose of the Study:
- To correct and update Digital Object Identifiers (DOIs) for several published articles.
- To ensure accurate referencing and accessibility of the scientific literature.
- To uphold the standards of scholarly communication and research integrity.
Main Methods:
- Identification of articles with erroneous DOIs.
- Verification of correct DOI information through database cross-referencing.
- Formal submission of corrections to the relevant publishing platforms.
Main Results:
- A series of specific article DOIs have been corrected.
- The corrected DOIs are now accurately linked to their respective publications.
- This process enhances the discoverability and citation accuracy of the affected research.
Conclusions:
- The timely correction of DOI errors is vital for the scientific community.
- Accurate metadata ensures the long-term accessibility and impact of research.
- Adherence to publishing standards supports robust scholarly communication.
Related Concept Videos
01:15Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
01:13Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5% chance...
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5% chance...
01:14Errors In Hypothesis Tests
When performing a hypothesis test, there are four possible outcomes depending on the actual truth (or falseness) of the null hypothesis and the decision to reject or not.
01:11Statistical Analysis: Overview
When we take repeated measurements on the same or replicated samples, we will observe inconsistencies in the magnitude. These inconsistencies are called errors. To categorize and characterize these results and their errors, the researcher can use statistical analysis to determine the quality of the measurements and/or suitability of the methods.
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...
01:28Accuracy, limits, and approximation
Accuracy, limits, and approximations are common in many fields, especially in engineering calculations. These concepts are imperative for ensuring that a given value is as close as possible to its true value.
Accuracy is defined as the closeness of the measured value to the true or actual value. In engineering mechanics, repeated measurements are taken during theoretical or experimental analyses to ensure that the result is precise and accurate.
The accuracy of any solution is based on the...
Accuracy is defined as the closeness of the measured value to the true or actual value. In engineering mechanics, repeated measurements are taken during theoretical or experimental analyses to ensure that the result is precise and accurate.
The accuracy of any solution is based on the...
01:07Data Collection by Survey
The systematic method of obtaining and analyzing accurate information of a population is called data collection. A survey is a standard method of data collection that involves collecting information from a target human population about their experience, opinion, or knowledge of a product, service, or process. The responses are recorded and interpreted. The most common survey examples are written questionnaires, face-to-face or telephonic conversations, focus groups, and electronic (e-mail or...