Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 16, 2026

Digital Home-Monitoring of Patients after Kidney Transplantation: The MACCS Platform
Published on: April 12, 2021
Determinants of Successful Implementation: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation of a Team-Based Telehealth Hypertension
Sunit Chhetri1, Srista Manandhar1, Austin L Seals1
1Departments of Internal and Cardiovascular Medicine, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Wake Forest University School of Medicine Winston-Salem NC USA.
Background:
Hypertension management using home blood pressure monitoring-guided pharmacotherapy is more effective than clinic-based care, but the benefit is attenuated in underserved patients. We evaluated implementation determinants of a team-based telehealth hypertension management program providing home blood pressure monitoring-guided pharmacotherapy and self-management and social support.
Methods:
We used Exploration, Preparation, Implementation and Sustainment, and Health Equity Implementation Frameworks for semistructured interviews and inductive/deductive coding using thematic analysis of qualitative data and quantitative analysis to evaluate team-based telehealth hypertension management program implementation facilitators, barriers, acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility. We purposefully sampled 20 patients with hypertension and 16 clinic key players from 2 safety-net clinics in North Carolina. Quantitative measures were Acceptability of Intervention Measure, Intervention Appropriateness Measure, Feasibility of Intervention Measure, Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care, Organizational Readiness for Implementing Change (all measures' score ranged 1-5; higher score is better). We used concurrent embedded mixed methods (qualitative + quantitative) for convergence and complementarity.
Results:
Five qualitative themes emerged around (1) staffing barriers, coordinated teamwork, and friendly study tools; (2) the program's patient and provider centeredness; (3) ease of home blood pressure monitoring; (4) personalized, comprehensive self-management calls; and (5) social support. Patients and clinic key players found the program acceptable (mean±SD, 4.42±0.84 and 4.56±0.59), appropriate (4.42±0.86 and 4.61±0.50), and feasible (4.40±0.89 and 4.44±0.53), respectively. Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care and Organizational Readiness for Implementing Change scores were 4.22±1.01 and 4.11±0.78, respectively.
Conclusions:
Implementing a team-based telehealth hypertension management program depends on its tailoring to patients and providers and having their endorsement; a user-friendly and trust-promoting model; and having a viable financial plan. Future studies should assess clinical and cost effectiveness of the program.
Registration: Url:
https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT05424744.
Related Concept Videos
Hypertension V: Nursing Management
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring
Several factors...
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic illness...
Community Based Intervention
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
Stress Prevention and Stress Management Techniques VI
Motivation and Self-Determination
Motivation, the driving force behind behavior, plays a pivotal role at every stage of the change process. The research...
