Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 16, 2026
Comparison of Agreement and Accuracy using Binocular Wavefront Optometer with Autorefractor and Phoropter
Published on: September 16, 2025
COMPARING REFRACTIVE OUTCOMES OF SECONDARY LENS SURGERY BETWEEN OPHTHALMOLOGY SUBSPECIALTIES IN PATIENTS WITH GOOD
Kannan Sharma1, Rachel Naomi Israilevich2, Emily Ross1
1Alix School of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Purpose:
The study compares refractive outcomes of secondary intraocular lens (SIOL) surgery performed by vitreoretinal, anterior segment, and both surgeons.
Methods:
Eyes included in this study underwent SIOL surgery from 2012 to 2024 and had a final postoperative visual acuity of 20/50 or better. Regression analysis compared refractive outcomes, and chi-squared analysis compared complications between subspecialty of SIOL surgeons.
Results:
A total of 94, 104, and 80 eyes were included in the retina surgeon, anterior segment surgeon, and combo surgeon cohorts, respectively. There was no significant difference in error between target and final postoperative spherical equivalence between retina and combo ( P = 0.079), retina and anterior segment ( P = 0.135), or anterior segment and combo cohorts ( P = 0.567). There was no significant difference in number of eyes with final spherical equivalence within 1 diopter of target spherical equivalence between retina and combo ( P = 0.136), retina and anterior segment ( P = 0.061), or anterior segment and combo cohorts ( P = 0.783). The retina cohort had higher postoperative corneal edema than the combo ( P = 0.017) and the anterior segment cohorts ( P = 0.035). The combo cohort had more postoperative retinal detachment than the anterior segment cohort ( P = 0.046).
Conclusion:
In eyes with good final vision, retina and anterior segment surgeons have similar refractive outcomes after SIOL surgery.
