Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Determination of Crystal Structures01:29

Determination of Crystal Structures

In the late 1800s, the revelation that light extended beyond visible wavelengths led to the discovery of X-rays by Wilhelm Roentgen. Recognized as high-energy electromagnetic radiation with short wavelengths, X-rays prompted exploration into their interaction with crystals. Max von Laue proposed in 1912 that the periodic arrangement of atoms, ions, or molecules in crystals would cause them to diffract X-rays, a hypothesis confirmed through experiments with copper sulfate and zinc sulfide...
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test01:00

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test

When one or more data points appear far from the rest of the data, there is a need to determine whether they are outliers and whether they should be eliminated from the data set to ensure an accurate representation of the measured value. In many cases, outliers arise from gross errors (or human errors) and do not accurately reflect the underlying phenomenon. In some cases, however, these apparent outliers reflect true phenomenological differences. In these cases, we can use statistical methods...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Stochastic Collision Theory of Magnetism in Radical Fluids.

The journal of physical chemistry letters·2026
Same author

Persistent homology analysis of longitudinal computed tomography fibrotic features in COPD.

The European respiratory journal·2026
Same author

Author Correction: RNaseH2A downregulation drives inflammatory gene expression via genomic DNA fragmentation in senescent and cancer cells.

Communications biology·2025
Same author

Verifying the efficient functional N species of metal-free N-doped carbons for CO<sub>2</sub>-to-CO electrochemical conversion using zeolite-templated carbons with N species tuned by a recarbonization treatment.

Nanoscale·2025
Same author

Homogenization of word relationships in schizophrenia: Topological analysis of cortical semantic representations.

Psychiatry and clinical neurosciences·2024
Same author

Facile Synthesis of N-Doped Metal-Free Catalysts for Oxygen Reduction Reaction via a Self-Sacrificed Template Method Using Zinc Amino-Acid Complex.

ACS omega·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 16, 2026

Novel Techniques for Observing Structural Dynamics of Photoresponsive Liquid Crystals
10:35

Novel Techniques for Observing Structural Dynamics of Photoresponsive Liquid Crystals

Published on: May 29, 2018

Systematic error detection in the database of liquid crystals (LiqCryst) using predictive models.

Yoshiaki Uchida1, Shizuo Kaji2, Naoto Nakano3

  • 1Graduate School of Engineering Science, The University of Osaka, 1-3 Machikaneyama, Toyonaka, Osaka, 560-8531, Japan. y.uchida.es@osaka-u.ac.jp.

Soft Matter
|May 14, 2026
PubMed
Summary

Machine learning (ML) models can identify anomalies in experimental data, distinguishing errors from potential discoveries. This human-in-the-loop approach enhances data integrity in materials science, particularly for liquid crystals.

More Related Videos

Measuring Magnetically-Tuned Ferroelectric Polarization in Liquid Crystals
07:03

Measuring Magnetically-Tuned Ferroelectric Polarization in Liquid Crystals

Published on: August 15, 2018

Preparation of Liquid Crystal Networks for Macroscopic Oscillatory Motion Induced by Light
07:56

Preparation of Liquid Crystal Networks for Macroscopic Oscillatory Motion Induced by Light

Published on: September 20, 2017

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 16, 2026

Novel Techniques for Observing Structural Dynamics of Photoresponsive Liquid Crystals
10:35

Novel Techniques for Observing Structural Dynamics of Photoresponsive Liquid Crystals

Published on: May 29, 2018

Measuring Magnetically-Tuned Ferroelectric Polarization in Liquid Crystals
07:03

Measuring Magnetically-Tuned Ferroelectric Polarization in Liquid Crystals

Published on: August 15, 2018

Preparation of Liquid Crystal Networks for Macroscopic Oscillatory Motion Induced by Light
07:56

Preparation of Liquid Crystal Networks for Macroscopic Oscillatory Motion Induced by Light

Published on: September 20, 2017

Area of Science:

  • Materials Science
  • Data Science
  • Chemistry

Background:

  • Experimental data frequently contain anomalies, which can stem from errors or represent unexplored scientific frontiers.
  • Identifying and classifying these anomalies is crucial for ensuring data reliability and fostering new discoveries.
  • Machine learning (ML) offers powerful tools for anomaly detection in large datasets.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and validate a human-in-the-loop ML approach for scrutinizing data integrity in materials science.
  • To leverage domain expertise alongside ML for accurate anomaly identification in liquid crystal phase transition data.
  • To differentiate between data errors and potentially novel scientific insights.

Main Methods:

  • An ML model was trained on the comprehensive LiqCryst 5.2 database of liquid crystalline (LC) material phase transition behaviors.
  • A human-in-the-loop system was implemented, integrating ML anomaly detection with expert human review.
  • Anomalies detected by the ML model were systematically re-examined by domain experts to ascertain their origin (error vs. new knowledge).

Main Results:

  • The ML model successfully identified multiple anomalies within the LiqCryst 5.2 database, a widely accepted industry standard.
  • Human experts confirmed the ML model's effectiveness in detecting inconsistencies in reported LC phase transition data.
  • The study demonstrated the model's capability to flag anomalies that warrant further investigation for potential scientific breakthroughs.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed human-in-the-loop ML methodology effectively enhances the scrutiny of experimental data integrity.
  • This approach can reliably detect errors and highlight unexplored phenomena, thereby stimulating future scientific discoveries.
  • The adaptable methodology holds broad applicability across diverse materials systems and scientific domains for data validation.