Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 16, 2026

Quantitative Analysis by Thermogravimetry-Mass Spectrum Analysis for Reactions with Evolved Gases
Published on: October 29, 2018
Generation and benchmarking of a diverse reaction database of quantum mechanical liquid-phase activation Gibbs free
Lingfeng Gui1, Alan Armstrong2, Claire S Adjiman1
1Department of Chemical Engineering, The Sargent Centre for Process Systems Engineering, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK. a.galindo@imperial.ac.uk.
Abstract:
Many chemical reactions occur in the liquid phase, making the accurate prediction of the liquid-phase activation Gibbs free energy, Δ≠G°,L, crucial for numerous applications. Quantum mechanical (QM) methods with implicit solvation models offer a valuable route to Δ≠G°,L prediction, although they are computationally demanding at high levels of theory and for larger systems. Data-driven surrogate models can address this issue but require extensive training and test datasets. We present here the liquid phase reaction energy database (LiPRED-2026), a QM reaction database containing 4513 Δ≠G°,L values for 28 diverse chemical reactions computed in various solvents at 298.15 K. The reactions have been chosen for their sensitivity to solvent effects and the availability of experimental data. The SMD model is employed to calculate solvation contributions to Δ≠G°,L because it can be used to account for the effect of solvent on the geometries of the reactants and transition states and it is suitable for charged species. The database contains Δ≠G°,L obtained from seven calculation methods, including the thermodynamic cycle method, the direct method, and their variants. Using a subset of the database, a benchmarking study shows that the best methods achieve a mean absolute error of 2.89 kcal mol-1 in absolute Δ≠G°,L and 1.00 kcal mol-1 in relative Δ≠G°,L, respectively, with the lower error for the relative Δ≠G°,L being mainly attributable to error cancellation. The use of a higher level of theory to calculate Δ≠G°,L improves relative Δ≠G°,L values only, but not absolute ones. These results provide valuable insights into the choice of methods and levels of theory appropriate for calculating Δ≠G°,L, while the database can serve for training and testing surrogate models.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
The Reaction Gibbs Energy
Free Energy Changes for Nonstandard States
Measuring Reaction Rates
Calculating Standard Free Energy Changes
Reaction Quotient
Standard Entropy Change for a Reaction

