Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 16, 2026

One-anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB) in Rats
Published on: November 10, 2018
Marginal Ulcers After Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: Patterns of Care, Treatment, and Outcomes from a Tertiary Referral
Joseph Klim1, Nour El Ghazal1, Alberto Migliorini1
1Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States.
Background:
Marginal ulcers (MU) represent a common and serious complication following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). While most MUs heal with conservative therapy, a subset requires endoscopic or surgical intervention. This study aims to characterize management trajectories and identify predictors of perforation.
Methods:
A retrospective review was performed to identify patients who underwent RYGB between 2008 and 2023 at a tertiary referral center and were subsequently diagnosed with MU. Baseline characteristics, management strategies, and clinical outcomes were collected. MU management was categorized as medical, endoscopic, or surgical. Continuous variables were summarized using medians with interquartile ranges (IQR), and categorical variables using frequencies and percentages. Univariate testing, multivariate regression, and time-to-event analyses were used to assess predictors of MU perforation.
Results:
Among 2106 patients, 241 patients developed MUs (incidence 11.4%). Ulcers were identified at a median of 7.1 months (IQR 3.0-16.2) following RYGB. Most patients (77.2%) resolved with medical management, while 22.8% required escalation to endoscopic (11.2%) or surgical (11.6%) intervention. The median time from MU diagnosis to surgical intervention was 12.1 months (IQR 4.9-21.2) after excluding patients who presented with perforation at the time of MU diagnosis. Ulcer perforation occurred in 24 patients and was managed with Graham patch repair or endoscopic techniques. Multivariate analysis showed that female sex (OR 0.31; 95% CI 0.11-0.85; p = 0.035) was associated with a decreased risk of perforation, while smoking resumption at 6 months postoperatively (OR 4.46; 95% CI 1.24-16.08; p 0.025) was associated with an increased risk. Univariate analysis also demonstrated that hand-sewn anastomosis was associated with significantly higher risk of MU perforation compared with linear stapling (OR 4.25, 95% CI 1.70-10.69; p = 0.002).
Conclusion:
Although most MUs respond to medical therapy, nearly one-quarter of patients require endoscopic or surgical intervention. Resumption of smoking after surgery and male sex are independently associated with perforation. These findings support early recognition of refractory disease, risk-factor modification, and timely escalation of care.
Related Concept Videos
Peptic Ulcer Disease V: Surgical Management and Nursing Care
Surgical Interventions for Peptic Ulcer Disease
Peptic Ulcer Disease III: Clinical Manifestations and Complications
Inflammatory Bowel Disease V: Surgical Management
Here are some common surgical interventions for IBD:
Peptic Ulcer Disease IV: Management
The therapeutic approach involves ensuring adequate rest, implementing drug therapy, promoting smoking cessation, making dietary modifications, and emphasizing long-term follow-up care.
Pharmacological management
The prevailing therapy for peptic ulcers involves a combination of managing the patient's current medication...
Peptic Ulcer Disease II: Pathophysiology
Peptic Ulcer Disease II: Pathophysiology
Damaging agents such as Helicobacter pylori, gastric acid, pepsin, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) can weaken the mucosal defense, allowing hydrogen ions to infiltrate back and harm epithelial cells.

