Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 16, 2026
Role of Diffusion MRI Tractography in Endoscopic Endonasal Skull Base Surgery
Published on: July 5, 2021
The "Inside-Out" Technique for Craniopharyngioma Surgery: Technical Nuances, Institutional Experience, and Global
Maria Karampouga1,2, Arseniy Pichugin3, Albert Trondin4
1Department of Neurological Surgery, Center for Cranial Base Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Background And Objectives:
Microvascular injury to the optic nerves and hypothalamus is a common source of morbidity during craniopharyngioma (CP) surgery. An optimal strategy to minimize this risk has not been well established. We aimed to describe the "inside-out" concept in CP resection, evaluate associated outcomes, and explore global perspectives on surgical strategies.
Methods:
The surgical technique involves accessing the tumor at a superficial point, and establishing a subpial, as opposed to a subarachnoid dissection plane with the surrounding tissues. The goal is to protect the microvasculature by preserving a thin tissue layer, centrifugally displaced by the tumor and interfacing with the subarachnoid space. An institutional review was conducted to validate the technique's applicability, along with an electronic survey among skull base course participants.
Results:
From January 2019 to December 2024, 46 patients harboring CPs underwent endonasal surgery using the "inside-out" technique. Gross/near total resection was accomplished in 83% and subtotal in 17% of patients. Postoperatively, cerebrospinal fluid leak was the most frequent complication (15%). Complete preservation of pituitary function was achieved in 13% of cases, while 40% of those with partial dysfunction retained some degree of pituitary function postoperatively. No infarcts or hypothalamic injuries were noted. Within a mean 34.5-month follow-up, recurrence occurred in 8 and 7 received retreatment. Significant correlations were observed between tumor volume and subtotal resection, subtotal resection and retreatment, subtotal resection and shorter time to retreatment, pituitary function loss and intraventricular tumor extension, and pituitary function loss and greater stalk disruption. The survey revealed that 81.1% of respondents favored subarachnoid dissection, 13.3% preferred subpial, and 5.6% found no difference, underscoring the importance of conveying the nuances of the "inside-out" technique.
Conclusion:
The "inside-out" dissection in CP surgery can reduce the rate of microvascular injury to the hypothalamus and optic apparatus, while potentially facilitating more complete resection.
