Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 16, 2026

An Affordable HIV-1 Drug Resistance Monitoring Method for Resource Limited Settings
Published on: March 30, 2014
Long-Acting PrEP for People With High Vulnerability to HIV Acquisition in Brazil: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
Wanyi Chen1, Paula M Luz2, Anjali Srinivasan1
1Medical Practice Evaluation Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Introduction:
In Brazil, men who have sex with men (MSM) and transgender women (TGW) remain heavily affected by HIV. Long-acting pre-exposure prophylaxis (LA PrEP) with injectable cabotegravir (CAB-LA) or lenacapavir (LEN-LA) is more effective at preventing HIV acquisition than oral PrEP. Our objective was to assess the potential clinical and economic impact of offering CAB-LA or LEN-LA to MSM and TGW with high vulnerability to HIV acquisition in Brazil and determine the maximum cost at which they would be cost-effective.
Methods:
We used the CEPAC microsimulation model of HIV prevention and treatment to evaluate two strategies for MSM and TGW aged 18-49: (1) SOC: standard-of-care oral PrEP at current coverage, and (2) SOC+LA: offering oral and LA PrEP (either CAB-LA or LEN-LA). Input parameters are derived from Brazil-based data from 2010 to 2024 and published studies: HIV incidence (%/year, MSM: 3.4 [age 18-29 years], 1.1 [30-49 years]; TGW: 5.0 [18-29 years], 1.7 [30-49 years]), relative risk reduction, LA versus oral PrEP (66% [CAB-LA]; 89% [LEN-LA]), PrEP coverage (20% [oral PrEP]; 20% [LA PrEP]) and oral PrEP cost (programmatic+drug = $207/year). Outcomes include lifetime HIV risk, life expectancy (LE) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of SOC+LA versus SOC in 2024 USD/year of life saved (YLS). We identified the maximum LA PrEP cost with ICER below the established Brazilian willingness-to-pay threshold of $8740/YLS.
Results:
Compared to SOC, SOC+CAB-LA would decrease MSM lifetime HIV risk from 21.4% to 16.8%, increase undiscounted LE from 39.0 to 39.4 years. For TGW, SOC+CAB-LA would decrease lifetime HIV risk from 29.5% to 23.4%, increase LE from 36.0 to 36.9 years. Results for SOC+LEN-LA would be similar to SOC+CAB-LA. SOC+LA would remain cost-effective for MSM at cost below $710/year for CAB-LA and $740/year for LEN-LA. Findings are most sensitive to LA PrEP cost, HIV incidence, and whether and by how much LA PrEP increases coverage.
Conclusions:
Offering LA PrEP with cabotegravir or lenacapavir in addition to oral PrEP for MSM and TGW in Brazil could markedly improve clinical outcomes and be cost-effective at ∼$700/year. Cost agreements are critical to ensure these prevention options are accessible in high-incidence settings.
Related Concept Videos
Retrovirus Life Cycles
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients
Bioequivalence studies: Biowaivers
Bioavailability Study Design: Single Versus Multiple Dose Studies
Sexually Transmitted Infections
Retroviruses

