Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 16, 2026

Detection and Isolation of Cancer in Prostate Biopsies Using Stimulated Raman Histology and Artificial Intelligence
Published on: June 10, 2025
Artificial Intelligence-Enhanced Identification of Incidental Findings in Prostate MRI
Dominika Skwierawska1, Shirin Heidarikahkesh, Dimitrios Bounias
1Institute of Radiology, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany (D.S., S.H., I.H., D.B., T.F., L.A.K., A.L., H.S., D.H., M.B., M.U., F.B.L., S.B.); Medical Informatics, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen-Tennenlohe, Germany (L.A.K.); Division of Medical Image Computing, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (D.B.); Medical Faculty Heidelberg, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany (D.B.); Innovation Centre for Digital Medicine, National Information Processing Institute, Warsaw, Poland (R.J.); Faculty of Mathematics and Information Science, Warsaw University of Technology, Warsaw, Poland (R.J.); Institute of Computer Science, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland (A.L.); Subdivision of Urology, Lower Silesian Oncology, Pulmonology and Hematology Center, Wrocław, Poland (K.T.); Department of Oncologic Urology, Medical Faculty, Wrocław University of Science and Technology, Wroclaw, Poland (K.T.).
Objectives:
The use of prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is increasing, and coverage often captures substantial portions of the pelvis, visualizing findings outside the prostate gland. The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of automated detection and segmentation of high-prevalence incidental findings in prostate MRI.
Materials And Methods:
This IRB-approved, retrospective study included n=465 prostate MRI examinations (1.5 and 3.0 T), comprising n=315 internal cases from our institution and n=150 external cases from 3 independent data sets. Manual segmentations were performed for perirectal lymph nodes, sigmoid diverticulosis, urinary bladder diverticula, bladder wall thickenings, inguinal hernias, periarticular bone changes of the hip, prominent synovial compartments of the hip, and hydroceles testis on axial T2-weighted (T2w) images for n=265 internal cases (n=520 ROIs). An nnU-Net model was trained on n=213 of these cases. The remaining n=52 independent cases (quantitative test set) were used for the quantitative evaluation of model performance using Dice score, intersection over union (IoU), Hausdorff distance (HD), mean surface distance (MSD), confusion matrices, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. Furthermore, n=200 additional examinations (reader test set), comprising n=50 internal, n=150 from 3 independent external data sets, were evaluated by 2 radiologists in an AI-assisted evaluation. Readers assessed the presence of incidental findings (step 1) and the correctness of the nnU-Net-predicted findings (step 2), based on the AI-predicted segmentations.
Results:
Segmentation performance varied between the incidental findings. Evaluation of the independent quantitative test set revealed that the highest mean Dice scores were achieved for sigmoid diverticulosis (0.80±0.14), hydroceles testis (0.76±0.20), and periarticular bone changes of the hip (0.70±0.07). Radiologists' evaluation of AI predictions on an independent reader test set comprising 1 internal and 3 external data sets demonstrated high agreement in AI-assisted evaluation for most incidental findings. Accuracies per data set (PROSTATEx/Ai4ar/internal/Prostate-3T) were 0.94/0.62/0.96/0.94 for perirectal lymph nodes, 0.82/0.80/0.80/0.84 for sigmoid diverticulosis, 0.86/0.86/0.98/0.98 for urinary bladder diverticula, 0.96/0.82/0.88/0.72 for bladder wall thickenings, 0.94/0.82/0.78/0.86 for inguinal hernias, 0.90/0.80/0.82/0.84 for periarticular bone changes of the hip, 0.90/0.82/0.84/0.96 for prominent synovial compartments of the hip, 0.98/0.80/0.96/0.96 for hydroceles testis. Inter-reader agreement for the AI-assisted evaluation of the presence of incidental findings on T2w images was high, with Cohen κ values ranging from 0.74 to 0.92 for most findings.
Conclusions:
The nnU-Net-based AI model was able to capture and segment frequent incidental findings in prostate MRI across 4 independent data sets, demonstrating potential to support radiologists in consistent reporting. This supports further research with larger, more diverse data sets, including additional annotations and clinical targets.
Insights
An AI model can automatically detect and segment common incidental findings in prostate MRI scans. This technology shows promise for improving radiologists' reporting consistency and efficiency.
Area of Science:
- Radiology
- Artificial Intelligence
- Medical Imaging
Background:
- Prostate MRI scans often reveal incidental findings outside the prostate gland.
- Automated detection of these findings can improve reporting efficiency.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the feasibility of an automated AI model for detecting and segmenting common incidental findings in prostate MRI.
- To assess the performance of the AI model across multiple datasets.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective study of 465 prostate MRI exams was conducted.
- An nnU-Net model was trained to segment findings like lymph nodes, hernias, and joint changes.
- Model performance was evaluated using Dice scores, IoU, and radiologist assessments on independent datasets.
Main Results:
- The AI model achieved varying segmentation performance across different findings, with high Dice scores for sigmoid diverticulosis and hydroceles testis.
- Radiologist evaluation showed high agreement with AI-assisted detection of incidental findings.
- Accuracy varied by dataset but was generally high for most findings.
Conclusions:
- The AI model successfully segmented frequent incidental findings in prostate MRI across diverse datasets.
- This technology has the potential to support radiologists in achieving consistent and efficient reporting.
- Further research with larger, diverse datasets is warranted.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies IV: Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Magnetic Resonance Imaging

