Artificial Intelligence-Enhanced Identification of Incidental Findings in Prostate MRI

Dominika Skwierawska1, Shirin Heidarikahkesh, Dimitrios Bounias

  • 1Institute of Radiology, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany (D.S., S.H., I.H., D.B., T.F., L.A.K., A.L., H.S., D.H., M.B., M.U., F.B.L., S.B.); Medical Informatics, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen-Tennenlohe, Germany (L.A.K.); Division of Medical Image Computing, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (D.B.); Medical Faculty Heidelberg, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany (D.B.); Innovation Centre for Digital Medicine, National Information Processing Institute, Warsaw, Poland (R.J.); Faculty of Mathematics and Information Science, Warsaw University of Technology, Warsaw, Poland (R.J.); Institute of Computer Science, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland (A.L.); Subdivision of Urology, Lower Silesian Oncology, Pulmonology and Hematology Center, Wrocław, Poland (K.T.); Department of Oncologic Urology, Medical Faculty, Wrocław University of Science and Technology, Wroclaw, Poland (K.T.).

Abstract

Insights

An AI model can automatically detect and segment common incidental findings in prostate MRI scans. This technology shows promise for improving radiologists' reporting consistency and efficiency.

Area of Science:

  • Radiology
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Medical Imaging

Background:

  • Prostate MRI scans often reveal incidental findings outside the prostate gland.
  • Automated detection of these findings can improve reporting efficiency.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the feasibility of an automated AI model for detecting and segmenting common incidental findings in prostate MRI.
  • To assess the performance of the AI model across multiple datasets.

Main Methods:

  • A retrospective study of 465 prostate MRI exams was conducted.
  • An nnU-Net model was trained to segment findings like lymph nodes, hernias, and joint changes.
  • Model performance was evaluated using Dice scores, IoU, and radiologist assessments on independent datasets.

Main Results:

  • The AI model achieved varying segmentation performance across different findings, with high Dice scores for sigmoid diverticulosis and hydroceles testis.
  • Radiologist evaluation showed high agreement with AI-assisted detection of incidental findings.
  • Accuracy varied by dataset but was generally high for most findings.

Conclusions:

  • The AI model successfully segmented frequent incidental findings in prostate MRI across diverse datasets.
  • This technology has the potential to support radiologists in achieving consistent and efficient reporting.
  • Further research with larger, diverse datasets is warranted.