Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 16, 2026

Rapid In Vivo Assessment of Adjuvant's Cytotoxic T Lymphocytes Generation Capabilities for Vaccine Development
Published on: June 19, 2018
Factors associated with serious adverse event following immunization: a real-world analysis of the vaccine adverse
Xuejiao Pan1, Yaping Chen1, Fuxing Chen1
1Department of Immunization Program, Zhejiang Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Hangzhou, China.
Background And Aims:
While vaccination is a vital and cost-effective public health tool, a small fraction of recipients experience serious adverse events (SAEs) that impose a profound clinical and systemic burden. Identifying the specific factors that predispose an individual to an SAE remains complex due to limitations in existing literature. This study analyzes SAE following immunization in the US population and identifies associated factors.
Methods:
We analyzed a national cross-section of 50,655 reports submitted to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) throughout 2025. Data were categorized into five domains: demographic characteristics, clinical features, medical history, vaccine variables, and patient outcomes. A multivariable logistic regression model was employed to identify factors associated with reporting SAEs.
Results:
Of the 50,655 AEFIs reported (median age: 40 years), 9.58% were classified as SAEs. Multivariable analysis identified significant demographic and clinical factors associated with SAE reporting, including advanced age (≥65 years, aOR: 1.73), male sex (aOR for females: 0.72), longer onset times (aOR: 1.06), administration facilities (military, aOR: 1.76; private facilities, aOR: 1.39), and systemic symptoms (aOR: 1.72), while local symptoms were highly protective (aOR: 0.35). Patient history variables, such as current illness (aOR: 1.51) and medical history (aOR: 1.24), were associated with increased odds of SAE reporting, while prior reactions were protective (aOR: 0.77). Regarding vaccine characteristics, mRNA platforms (Pfizer/Wyeth aOR: 1.65), second doses (aOR: 1.33), non-intramuscular administration routes (oral aOR: 2.85; subcutaneous aOR: 1.51), and right-arm injections (aOR: 1.24) were all associated with higher odds of SAEs.
Conclusion:
SAE reporting is driven by a complex intersection of demographic, clinical, and vaccine-related characteristics. These findings carry significant clinical and public health implications, highlighting the need for enhanced screening and proactive monitoring of high-risk populations to optimize global vaccine safety protocols. Future studies should integrate passive reporting with active surveillance to optimize vaccine safety protocols.
Related Concept Videos
Pharmacovigilance
This process, termed pharmacovigilance, aims to detect, evaluate, and minimize harmful effects related to medication use. The data collection for pharmacovigilance depends on spontaneous reporting systems, where healthcare professionals or patients voluntarily report suspected ADRs.
In some cases, there...
Vaccinations
Pharmaceutical Poisoning: Potential Scenarios
Hypersensitivity Reactions: Immune-Complex Reactions
Types of Reports II: Incident or Occurrence Report
Purposes:
In the healthcare industry, reports play a crucial role in documenting incidents within an agency. The primary objective of these reports is to ensure patient safety, uphold the...
Factors Affecting the Risk of Infection
The integrity and count of the white blood cells help the body resist pathogens and fight infection. When impaired, it reduces the body's resistance to pathogens. The acidic pH levels of the gastrointestinal, genitourinary tracts, and skin create...