Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 16, 2026

Preoxygenation Techniques for Tracheal Intubation in Critically Ill Adults Utilizing Oxygen Mask and Noninvasive Ventilation
Published on: December 5, 2025
A three-factor nomogram predicts the use of invasive mechanical ventilation within 72 h in preterm infants
Li Guo1, Zhiyang Zhang2, Ze Zhang2
1Department of Neonatal, The Fourth Hospital of Shijiazhuang, Shijiazhuang, China.
Insights
A new three-factor model accurately predicts preterm infants needing invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) within 72 hours. This tool aids early respiratory support decisions for at-risk newborns.
Area of Science:
- Neonatal Medicine
- Pediatric Critical Care
- Respiratory Physiology
Background:
- Early identification of preterm infants requiring invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) is crucial for timely respiratory support.
- Ventilation-related harm in preterm infants necessitates accurate risk prediction models.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and internally validate a parsimonious prediction model for IMV in preterm infants within 72 hours of birth.
- To identify key predictors for IMV in the early neonatal period.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective cohort study of 1,059 preterm infants was conducted, with data split into training (n=742) and validation (n=317) sets.
- Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression identified 1-min Apgar score, pulmonary surfactant administration, and early-onset sepsis as predictors.
- The primary outcome was IMV lasting ≥12 consecutive hours within 72 hours of birth. Model performance was assessed using AUC, calibration metrics, and decision-curve analysis (DCA).
Main Results:
- The final model demonstrated good predictive performance in the validation set with an AUC of 0.816.
- At the optimal threshold (0.224), the model achieved a sensitivity of 0.613, specificity of 0.914, and accuracy of 0.855.
- The model showed good calibration and net benefit across a range of probability thresholds, with sensitivity analysis confirming robustness.
Conclusions:
- A three-factor model incorporating perinatal and early neonatal indicators accurately predicts the need for IMV within 72 hours.
- This model is well-calibrated and suitable for bedside risk stratification in preterm infants.
- External validation is recommended to confirm the model's generalizability.
Background:
Early identification of preterm infants at risk for invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) enables timely respiratory support and may reduce ventilation-related harm.
Objective:
To develop and internally validate a parsimonious prediction model for IMV within 72 h after birth.
Methods:
We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study (July 2023-June 2024) including 1,059 preterm infants admitted within 72 h of life and randomly split them into training (n = 742) and validation (n = 317) sets. Exclusions included chorioamnionitis and deaths ≤ 72 h. Forty-five candidate variables were screened; after multiple imputation, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (20-fold cross-validation, λ1se) identified three predictors for multivariable logistic modeling: 1-min Apgar score, pulmonary surfactant administration within 72 h, and early-onset sepsis. The primary endpoint was endotracheal IMV lasting ≥ 12 consecutive hours within 72 h of birth. Discrimination, calibration, and decision-curve analysis (DCA) were assessed. Sensitivity analysis restricted early-onset sepsis to culture-proven cases.
Results:
In the validation set, the model achieved an AUC of 0.816; at the optimal probability threshold (0.224), sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 0.613, 0.914, and 0.855, respectively. Calibration was good (Brier score 0.096; Hosmer-Lemeshow P = 0.28; expected/observed ratio = 1), and DCA showed net benefit across thresholds 0.10-0.70. Culture-proven analysis yielded AUC 0.830 with similar calibration; a pulmonary surfactant × sepsis interaction was significant (β = -2.531, P = 0.028).
Conclusion:
A three-factor model based on perinatal and early neonatal indicators provides accurate, well-calibrated prediction of IMV within 72 h and is readily implementable for bedside risk stratification; external validation is warranted.
Related Concept Videos
Mechanical Ventilation I: Indication and Settings
Mechanical Ventilation III: Noninvasive Ventilation
Noninvasive Positive-Pressure Ventilation (NIPPV)
Mechanical Ventilation II: Invasive Ventilation
Negative-Pressure Ventilators
Negative-pressure ventilators create a vacuum around the chest or body to draw air into the lungs, simulating breathing. This method does not require an...
Assessment of Ventilation I: Respiratory Rate
A Ventilation assessment is critical for monitoring a patient's health status. Respiration, one of the most accessible vital signs, provides insights into the function of numerous body systems and can indicate serious health issues, such as brainstem injuries from head trauma.
Critical Guidelines for Assessing Ventilation:
Factors Affecting Pulmonary Ventilation
Alveolar Surface Tension
The alveolar fluid lines the luminal surface of the alveoli and exerts a force called surface tension. This force is caused by the polar water molecules in the liquid being more strongly attracted to each...