Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 16, 2026
Automatic Identification of Dendritic Branches and their Orientation
Published on: September 17, 2021
Bibliometric analysis of neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging: research patterns, evolution, and
Shenghan Wang1,2, Chao Wang1,2, Wenwen Song1,2
1Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University (Zhejiang Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine), Hangzhou, China.
Background:
Neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging (NODDI), an emerging diffusion MRI technique for estimating the microstructural pathology of brain tissue in vivo, has attracted significant research interest. However, a systematic bibliometric analysis of this field remains unexamined. This study aims to perform a bibliometric analysis of the NODDI literature to explore the current research landscape, identify emerging trends, and provide insights for future investigations.
Methods:
NODDI-related publications were retrieved from the Web of Science (WOS) and Scopus databases during the period of 2012 to 2025. CiteSpace, VOSviewer, and Bibliometrix R package were used to generate visualization maps.
Results:
A total of 679 publications related to NODDI were identified from WOS, including 653 research articles and 26 review papers. 844 relevant publications were retrieved from the Scopus database. After 2012, the number of publications on NODDI increased rapidly. Sweden demonstrated the highest average citation per paper, while the United States contributed the largest number of publications. University College London was the most productive institution. Hui Zhang was identified as the most prolific author, while Alexander DC achieved the highest average citation count. NeuroImage was recognized as the leading journal in terms of publication frequency. Common keywords included "diffusion magnetic resonance imaging," "NODDI," "brain," and "multiple sclerosis." Recent studies show the research focus is shifting from methodological development to clinical application, especially in the field of neuropsychiatric disorders, and is being integrated with emerging methodologies such as Mendelian randomization.
Conclusions:
This bibliometric analysis highlights potential directions for future NODDI-related research. Future studies may focus on optimizing imaging techniques, investigating neuropsychiatric disorders, and integrating advanced methodologies.
