Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 16, 2026

Measuring the Structure, Composition, and Change of Underwater Environments with Large-area Imaging
Published on: April 18, 2025
2D to 3D: Exploring Variation of Niche Dimensionality Across Consumers in a Coastal Arctic Ecosystem and Implications
Paloma C Carvalho1, Kelsey F Johnson1, Kyle H Elliott2
1Fisheries and Oceans Canada Winnipeg Manitoba Canada.
Abstract:
Each species occupies a distinct ecological niche, defined by a specific set of environmental conditions and resource requirements necessary for its survival and reproduction. However, climate change is altering species distributions, predator-prey relationships, and resource partitioning between species, with these changes being pronounced in the Arctic. Stable isotope analysis of carbon (δ13C) and nitrogen (δ15N) has been widely used to estimate isotopic niches and quantify niche overlap among species using a two-dimensional approach (2D). However, δ13C is not always sufficient to differentiate habitat and resource use among species due to minimal variation between end-members. Incorporating sulfur stable isotopes (δ34S) can enhance resolution in such cases. Using an Arctic coastal food web as a model system, we used a three-dimensional isotopic niche approach (3D: δ13C-δ15N-δ34S) with 664 individuals across 49 species spanning multiple taxonomic groups (invertebrates, fish, seabirds, and marine mammals) that utilize resources from benthic and pelagic habitats. We compared the traditional 2D isotopic niches with a 3D framework using nicheROVER to assess how the addition of a third dimension changes niche size estimates and probability of niche overlap between species. We found that several benthic-associated species, including the common eider (Somateria mollissima) and various benthic invertebrates, tended to show greater changes in isotopic niche size with the addition of δ34S than pelagic-associated species. In addition, niche overlap among benthic-associated taxa generally decreased with the 3D approach, suggesting better resolution of habitat use and resource partitioning. This reflects the greater ecological diversity, foraging specialization, and more complex food web structure characteristic of benthic than pelagic ecosystems. We recommend incorporating δ34S for aquatic studies that involve benthic habitats and emphasize the value of multidimensional approaches to increase the resolution of ecological niche analysis.
Related Concept Videos
Ecological Niches
Deep Sea Microbial Ecology
Marine Microbial Ecology
Speciation Rates
Diversity of Protists III
Diversity of Archaea III
