Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 17, 2026

Microbiological Rapid On-Site Evaluation for Pulmonary Infectious Diseases
Published on: March 1, 2024
Evaluating the Impact of Respiratory Pathogen Testing on Pediatric Emergency Department Return Visits and Management
Alexander M Stephan1,2, Jaime Y Pérez-Lizardi2, Lana M Stern1
1Department of Emergency Medicine, NewYork-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical Center.
Insights
Limited respiratory pathogen panel (RPP) testing is sufficient for children with viral respiratory illnesses. Comprehensive RPP testing did not reduce 7-day return visits or interventions in the pediatric emergency department.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Emergency Medicine
- Infectious Diseases
- Diagnostic Testing
Background:
- Viral respiratory illnesses are common in children presenting to the pediatric emergency department (PED).
- Respiratory pathogen panel (RPP) testing is increasingly used to identify causative pathogens.
- The optimal scope of RPP testing (limited vs. comprehensive) in this setting is unclear.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the association of limited versus comprehensive RPP testing with 7-day return visit rates.
- To evaluate the impact of RPP testing scope on management and disposition during return visits.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective cohort study of children (61 days to 18 years) discharged from a PED with viral respiratory illness.
- Comparison of limited (SARS-CoV-2, influenza, RSV) versus comprehensive (22 pathogens) RPP testing.
- Analysis of 7-day PED return visits, interventions, and disposition, controlling for covariates.
Main Results:
- No significant difference in 7-day PED return visit rates between limited and comprehensive RPP testing groups.
- Patients with limited RPP testing were more likely to have additional urine studies on return visits.
- No differences observed in other return visit interventions like blood tests, imaging, or antibiotic prescribing.
Conclusions:
- Limited RPP testing appears sufficient for children with viral respiratory illness managed as outpatients.
- Comprehensive RPP testing does not offer additional benefits in reducing return visits or interventions.
- This finding supports the judicious use of diagnostic resources in the pediatric emergency setting.
Objectives:
To determine whether limited versus comprehensive respiratory pathogen panel (RPP) testing in children discharged from the pediatric emergency department (PED) with a viral respiratory illness is associated with 7-day PED return visit rate and return visit management and disposition.
Methods:
We conducted a retrospective cohort study of children 61 days to 18 years of age discharged from a large urban PED between June 1, 2023 to August 31, 2023 and December 1, 2023 to February 29, 2024, who received either limited (SARS-CoV-2, influenza A/B, respiratory syncytial virus) or comprehensive (22 pathogens) RPP testing for a clinically diagnosed viral respiratory illness. We recorded basic demographics, RPP test results, 7-day PED returns, and interventions and disposition during return visits.
Results:
Of 2346 eligible patients, 1417 (60.4%) received limited RPP testing and 929 (39.6%) received comprehensive RPP testing. No difference was found in the 7-day PED return visit rate for limited testing compared with comprehensive testing after controlling for age, sex, race/ethnicity, insurance, Emergency Severity Index level, and visit season (aOR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.67-1.38). On return visits, patients who had received limited testing were more likely to undergo additional urine studies (aOR: 2.70, 95% CI: 1.16-6.84); no differences were found in additional blood tests, throat swabs, chest radiographs, IV placements, medication administration, antibiotic prescribing, or disposition.
Conclusions:
Limited RPP testing is likely sufficient for children with a viral respiratory illness in the outpatient setting, as comprehensive RPP testing was not associated with a reduction in 7-day return visits or return visit interventions.
Related Concept Videos
Pneumonia III: Complications and Assessment
Assessment of Respiration
Subjective Assessment: Nurses interview the patient to gather information directly during the subjective assessment. It includes questions about the individual's medical history, medications, and symptoms, focusing on past respiratory conditions like asthma or COPD,...
Respiratory Assessment: Purpose and Indications
Objectives and Importance:
The primary goal of respiratory assessment is to evaluate patients at early risk of clinical deterioration. Since respiratory distress often precedes other signs of declining health, breathing patterns and sounds become a...
Physical Assessment of the Respiratory Tract I: Health History
Subjective Data
Subjective data provides vital information about the patient's health history and symptoms. This data is typically collected through interviews in which patients describe their experiences, symptoms, and concerns.
Health history and key...
Pneumonia IV: Management
Bacterial Pneumonia Treatment
For bacterial pneumonia, antibiotics serve as the cornerstone of therapy. Initial treatment often begins with empirical antibiotics, tailored to the anticipated causative organism and adjusted based on culture results. Key antibiotic choices include:
Endoscopic Studies II: Thoracocentesis
Description
Excess pleural fluid or air may accumulate in some respiratory disorders in the thoracic cavity. To treat pleural effusion, a physician conducts thoracentesis by carefully piercing the chest wall and entering...
