Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 17, 2026
Non-Invasive Visualization of Nailbed Microvascular Morphology in Mice Using Capillaroscopy
Published on: February 28, 2025
Comparison of artificial intelligence and rheumatologists in nailfold capillaroscopic evaluation
Neşe Çabuk Çelik1, Elif Altunel Kılınç2
1Sincan Training and Research Hospital, Department of Rheumatology - Ankara, Türkiye.
Objective:
The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of a pretrained Vision Transformer model on nailfold capillaroscopy images, comparing its performance to that of expert rheumatologists.
Methods:
We retrospectively analyzed 104 anonymized images (23 normal, 81 pathological) from publicly available datasets. The pretrained Vision Transformer model was applied without fine-tuning. Two rheumatologists independently assessed the same image set. Accuracy and interrater agreement were calculated.
Results:
The AI model produced 0% clinical applicability, failing to generate meaningful classifications. In contrast, the consensus of two rheumatologists achieved the highest diagnostic performance, with 94.2% accuracy and a Cohen's Kappa of 0.827. Individual rheumatologist evaluations yielded comparatively lower accuracy and agreement.
Conclusion:
We retrospectively analyzed X anonymized images (XX normal, XX pathological) from publicly available datasets. The pretrained Vision Transformer model was applied without fine-tuning. Two rheumatologists independently assessed the same image set. Accuracy and interrater agreement were calculated.
