Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 17, 2026

Restraint to Induce Stress in Mice and Rats
Published on: December 6, 2024
Patients' experiences and perceptions of physical restraint in psychiatric care: A descriptive qualitative study at
Judith Eladi1, Sofia Sanga2, Joel Seme Ambikile2
1Muhimbili National Hospital, Mloganzila, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Physical restraint in psychiatric care remains controversial due to ethical concerns and the risk for physical and psychological harm. Despite its continued use to manage aggression and maintain safety, evidence on patients' experiences in low-resource settings, including Tanzania, is limited. This study explored patients' experiences and perceptions of physical restraint during psychiatric hospitalization at Muhimbili National Hospital. A qualitative descriptive design was used involving 14 purposively selected adult patients who had experienced physical restraint. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis, and seven themes were identified. Participants described restraint as a complex intervention with both perceived benefits and significant harms. While some acknowledged its role in preventing violence, maintaining ward safety, and supporting treatment during acute agitation, many reported negative experiences, including pain and injury, loss of dignity, humiliation, lack of explanation, ignored requests for assistance, and feelings of coercion or punishment. Limited involvement in decision making and the absence of post-restraint debriefing further undermined trust in healthcare providers. Although some participants accepted restraint as necessary in certain situations, many recommended alternatives, such as verbal de-escalation, attentive communication, pharmacological calming, and close observation. When restraint was unavoidable, patients emphasized the need for humane implementation, including minimal force, short duration, continuous monitoring, and respectful interaction. Overall, physical restraint was experienced as both protective and potentially harmful. The findings highlight the need for context-specific patient-centered approaches that prioritize communication, alternatives to restraint, post-restraint engagement, and staff training to strengthen ethical and rights-based mental health care in Tanzania.
Physical restraint in psychiatric care remains controversial due to ethical concerns and the risk for physical and psychological harm. Despite its continued use to manage aggression and maintain safety, evidence on patients' experiences in low-resource settings, including Tanzania, is limited. This study explored patients' experiences and perceptions of physical restraint during psychiatric hospitalization at Muhimbili National Hospital. A qualitative descriptive design was used involving 14 purposively selected adult patients who had experienced physical restraint. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis, and seven themes were identified. Participants described restraint as a complex intervention with both perceived benefits and significant harms. While some acknowledged its role in preventing violence, maintaining ward safety, and supporting treatment during acute agitation, many reported negative experiences, including pain and injury, loss of dignity, humiliation, lack of explanation, ignored requests for assistance, and feelings of coercion or punishment. Limited involvement in decision making and the absence of post-restraint debriefing further undermined trust in healthcare providers. Although some participants accepted restraint as necessary in certain situations, many recommended alternatives, such as verbal de-escalation, attentive communication, pharmacological calming, and close observation. When restraint was unavoidable, patients emphasized the need for humane implementation, including minimal force, short duration, continuous monitoring, and respectful interaction. Overall, physical restraint was experienced as both protective and potentially harmful. The findings highlight the need for context-specific patient-centered approaches that prioritize communication, alternatives to restraint, post-restraint engagement, and staff training to strengthen ethical and rights-based mental health care in Tanzania.
Related Concept Videos
The Stanford Prison Experiment
Obedience
Psychosurgery
Historical Development of Psychosurgery
In the 1930s, Portuguese neurologist Antonio Egas Moniz introduced a surgical procedure designed...
Ethical Standards II
Nurses are entrusted with upholding various ethical principles and standards. Nurses forge solid therapeutic relationships using trust, empathy, autonomy, confidentiality, and professional competence.
Confidentiality is crucial, embodying respect for individual privacy and...
Techniques of therapeutic communication I: Active Listening, Sharing Observations, Validation, and Using Touch
Therapeutic communication is not the same as social interaction. Social interaction has no goal or purpose and consists of casual information sharing, whereas therapeutic communication has a plan or purpose for the conversation. Therapeutic...
Naturalistic Observations