Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 17, 2026

Measuring Biophysical and Psychological Stress Levels Following Visitation to Three Locations with Differing Levels of Nature
Published on: June 19, 2019
Effects of indoor physical environment and psychosocial stress on work performance in a Thai academic setting
Watcharakorn Chuthong1,2, Vithawat Surawattanasakul3,4, Wuttipat Kiratipaisarl5
1Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Bankhai Hospital, Rayong, Thailand.
Abstract:
While physical indoor environmental quality (IEQ) and psychosocial stress are known to affect employee well-being, their combined influence on multidimensional work performance remains underexplored, particularly within academic medical settings in Southeast Asia. To address this gap, this cross-sectional study investigated the associations between specific work performance domains and both physical and psychosocial environments among office workers in a Thai academic medical institute. A survey was conducted among 419 administrative staff members (51.16% response rate) employed for over six months. Participants completed paper-based questionnaires assessing: (1) demographics, (2) physical indoor environment perceptions (7-point Likert scale), (3) psychosocial environment (Thai Effort-Reward Imbalance Questionnaire), and (4) work performance (Individual Work Performance Questionnaire). Multiple linear regression analyzed relationships between these factors and three performance domains: task performance (TP), contextual performance (CP), and counterproductive work behavior (CWB). While TP was negatively associated with male gender (β = -0.14, 95% CI: -0.26 to -0.03), CP was significantly hindered by perceived stagnant air movement (β = -0.07, 95% CI: -0.12 to -0.02) and facilitated by adequate privacy (β = 0.06, 95% CI: 0.01 to 0.11). Furthermore, high-risk effort-reward imbalance was a strong predictor of lower CWB scores (β = -0.26, 95% CI: -0.45 to -0.07), indicating that highly stressed individuals engaged in more frequent counterproductive behaviors. These findings demonstrate that physical and psychosocial factors are significantly associated with specific performance dimensions. Specifically, poor air movement and a lack of privacy are linked to lower contextual performance, while work stress is positively correlated with counterproductive behavior. Consequently, institutional policies should prioritize improving ventilation, enhancing workplace privacy, and balancing effort-reward structures to optimize staff productivity and well-being.
More Related Videos
12:22Mindfulness in Motion (MIM): An Onsite Mindfulness Based Intervention (MBI) for Chronically High Stress Work Environments to Increase Resiliency and Work Engagement
Published on: July 1, 2015
07:17Assessing the Effects of Music Listening on Psychobiological Stress in Daily Life
Published on: February 2, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Stress and Mental Health
Individuals with depression often experience challenges in both their personal and professional...
Psychological Responses to Stress
Introduction to Stress and Lifestyle
Psychoneuroimmunology: Cardiovascular Disease
A key area of focus in PNI is the relationship between stress and coronary...
Stress Prevention and Stress Management Techniques II
Type A Personality: Driven and Easily Stressed
Individuals with Type A personalities are often highly competitive and ambitious and operate with a strong sense of urgency. Commonly labeled as "workaholics," they...
Types of Stressors
Catastrophes
Catastrophes refer to large-scale, unpredictable events that create overwhelming stress and a sense of threat. Examples include natural disasters like...