Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 17, 2026
07:13
Multimodal Cross-Device and Marker-Free Co-Registration of Preclinical Imaging Modalities
Published on: October 27, 2023
Decoding collaboration obstacles: a survey on reporting preferences between neuroradiologists and clinical
Felix Gunzer1,2, Giovanna Brandi3, Reza Seiffert4,5
1Department of Neuroradiology, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. felix.gunzer@icloud.com.
Insights Into Imaging
|May 15, 2026
Summary
Clinicians prefer structured neuroradiology reports with key images and data, while radiologists favor traditional formats. Aligning these reporting preferences can improve interdisciplinary communication and clinical workflows.
Area of Science:
- Neuroradiology
- Medical Communication
- Clinical Workflow Optimization
Background:
- Effective communication between neuroradiologists and clinicians is crucial for optimal patient care.
- Discrepancies in reporting preferences can lead to communication barriers and workflow inefficiencies.
- Understanding these differences is key to improving interdisciplinary collaboration in neuroscience.
Purpose of the Study:
- To quantify reporting preferences and identify communication barriers between neuroradiologists and neuro-associated clinicians.
- To assess satisfaction with current reporting practices and explore desired report features.
- To provide data-driven recommendations for enhancing neuroradiology reporting.
Main Methods:
- Two multilingual online surveys were administered to neuroradiologists and clinicians (neurology, neurosurgery, otorhinolaryngology).
- Surveys included questions on demographics, satisfaction, and specific report preferences (e.g., structured vs. conventional, use of classifications, quantitative measurements, key images).
- Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the collected data.
Main Results:
- Eighty physicians responded (21 neuroradiologists, 59 clinicians).
- Clinicians favored context-based structured reports (45.8%) with classifications, quantitative measurements, and key images (89.8% found useful).
- Neuroradiologists showed a preference for conventional formats, with many indicating a need for more detailed clinical information.
Conclusions:
- A significant divergence exists in reporting preferences between neuroradiologists and clinicians.
- Clinicians desire structured reports with specific elements, while neuroradiologists lean towards traditional formats.
- Implementing context-based structured reporting templates with clear governance can bridge this gap and improve interdisciplinary workflows.
Related Concept Videos
01:21Aneurysm II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Thoracic, aortic arch and abdominal aneurysms are significant vascular conditions that can present with various clinical manifestations and lead to serious complications. Understanding these manifestations and the appropriate diagnostic studies is essential for effective management and treatment.Thoracic Aortic AneurysmsThoracic aortic aneurysms often remain asymptomatic until they reach a size that impinges on adjacent structures. They typically cause deep, diffuse chest pain that radiates to...
01:24Data Reporting and Recording
Reporting and recording are crucial in data documentation. The timely, thorough, and accurate documentation of facts is essential when recording patient data. Failure to record findings during an assessment or interpretation of a problem will result in loss of information and make the patient document unreliable. The reader is left with general impressions if the information is not specific. A recording is documenting data of the individual's health information in a traceable, secure, and...