Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 17, 2026

Evaluation of Colorectal Cancer Risk and Prevalence by Stool DNA Integrity Detection
Published on: June 8, 2020
Navigating false-positive outcomes after stool-based colorectal cancer screening tests: a scoping review
Amal Cheema1, Katherine Levy2, Audrey H Calderwood3,4
1Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Following a positive stool test and negative colonoscopy, cancer screening requires standardized reporting. This review highlights variable outcomes for colorectal cancer and extra-colonic cancers, emphasizing the need for better clinical management strategies.
Area of Science:
- Gastroenterology
- Oncology
- Preventive Medicine
Background:
- Colorectal cancer screening with stool tests can lead to positive results, necessitating colonoscopy.
- A negative colonoscopy after a positive stool test presents management challenges, particularly concerning potential extra-colonic cancers.
Purpose of the Study:
- To synthesize current clinical approaches and cancer outcomes after positive stool tests and negative colonoscopies.
- To identify research gaps in managing patients with positive stool tests and negative colonoscopies, especially regarding extra-colonic cancers.
Main Methods:
- A scoping review of English-language, peer-reviewed articles published up to September 2025.
- Two independent reviewers screened titles, abstracts, and full texts, extracting relevant data.
- Thematic synthesis explored outcomes and work-up strategies for false-positive stool tests (FIT, mt-sDNA) in extra-colonic cancer screening.
Main Results:
- Eight studies met inclusion criteria from 3442 identified.
- Demographic reporting was variable; most patients were female and over 50.
- Colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence was ~0.5% on second colonoscopy; extra-colonic aerodigestive/upper GI cancer incidence ranged from 0-4.3%.
Conclusions:
- Significant heterogeneity exists in reporting stool test positivity, negative colonoscopy definitions, and follow-up times.
- A standardized reporting framework is crucial for synthesizing study data.
- Improved standardization will enhance clinical management for patients with positive stool tests and negative colonoscopies.
Related Concept Videos
Serum Laboratory Studies, Stool Test, Breath Test
Imaging Studies III: Gastrointestinal Motility Studies and Virtual Colonoscopy
Radionuclide Testing
Radionuclide testing is a sophisticated medical technique for assessing gastrointestinal motility. It focuses on gastric emptying and colonic transit time. Radioactive markers track the movement of food through the digestive system, providing insights into gastrointestinal disorders.
In gastric emptying studies, a meal's liquid and solid...
Assessment of the Rectum and Anus
Rectal Inspection
Begin by inspecting the perianal and anal areas for color, texture, rashes,...
Endoscopic Procedures II: Colonoscopy
Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy
Sigmoidoscopy
Sigmoidoscopy is a diagnostic procedure that uses a flexible sigmoidoscope equipped with a light source and camera to examine the rectum and sigmoid colon. The procedure involves inserting the tube through the anus...
Inflammatory Bowel Disease III: Diagnostic Studies and Management I-Nutritional Therapy
Diagnostic studies
A colonoscopy is the definitive screening test, distinguishing ulcerative colitis from other colon diseases with similar symptoms. During a colonoscopy test, inflamed mucosa with exudate ulcerations can be observed, and biopsies are taken to determine the histologic characteristics of the colonic...
