Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 18, 2026

06:50
A High-Throughput Electrochemiluminescence 7-Plex Assay Simultaneously Screening for Type 1 Diabetes and Multiple Autoimmune Diseases
Published on: May 29, 2020
Laboratory testing for anti-synthetase antibodies: a novel algorithm to improve diagnostic accuracy
Andrés Baucells1, Laura Martínez-Martínez2, Mireia Fonolleda3
1Laboratory Department, Parc Taulí Hospital Universitari. Institut d'Investigació I Innovació Parc Taulí (I3PT-CERCA), Sabadell, Spain.
Summary
Commercial anti-ARS assays show high variability. Raising the line blot cut-off to 3+ and considering IIF patterns significantly improves diagnostic accuracy for anti-synthetase syndrome (ASyS).
Area of Science:
- Clinical immunology
- Autoimmune diagnostics
- Laboratory medicine
Background:
- Anti-synthetase syndrome (ASyS) is characterized by autoantibodies against aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (ARS).
- Existing commercial assays for anti-ARS antibodies exhibit variable accuracy.
- This study addresses the need to evaluate commonly used anti-ARS assays in Spanish clinical labs.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the accuracy and reliability of commercial anti-ARS assays.
- To identify methods for improving the diagnostic performance of anti-ARS detection.
- To develop a diagnostic algorithm for more dependable anti-ARS testing.
Main Methods:
- Evaluated 99 serum samples from five Spanish laboratories, initially positive for anti-ARS by line blot (LB).
- Samples were re-tested using indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) on HEp-2 cells, dot blot (DB), and RNA immunoprecipitation (RNA-IP) at a central laboratory.
- Confirmation of anti-ARS antibodies was based on DB or RNA-IP results.
Main Results:
- Only 27% of initial anti-ARS positive samples were confirmed, with a 5% confirmation rate for LB intensity 1+ and 2+.
- Increasing the LB cut-off to 3+ and including a diagnosis-compatible IIF pattern achieved a 100% confirmation rate.
- RNA-IP was most sensitive for anti-PL-12, anti-EJ, and anti-OJ; DB was more sensitive for anti-Jo-1 and anti-PL-7.
Conclusions:
- Commercial LB methods for anti-ARS detection show significant variability, with a high unconfirmed rate (73%).
- A LB signal intensity cut-off of 3+ combined with a compatible IIF pattern substantially increases specificity.
- A new diagnostic algorithm can enhance the reliability of anti-ARS detection in routine practice.

