Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 19, 2026

Transcorporal Artificial Urinary Sphincter Cuff Placement in a Case Requiring Revision for Urethral Atrophy
Published on: June 16, 2022
Use of TYRX antibacterial envelope in inflatable penile prosthesis surgery: a prospective pilot study
Jack T Rifkin1, Julia A Baran1, Brian H Im1
1Department of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA 19107, United States.
Background:
Infection remains a major concern in inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) surgery. Medtronic's TYRX Absorbable Antibacterial Envelope is a polypropylene mesh pocket delivering minocycline and rifampin for 7 days and fully absorbing in 9 weeks. It is currently FDA-approved for use with cardiac pacemakers and neuromodulation devices. There is no indication for use in IPP surgeries, particularly for enveloping the scrotal pump during implantation.
Aim:
This pilot study evaluates the feasibility, safety, and early patient-reported outcomes with the use of the absorbable antibacterial envelope during IPP surgery.
Methods:
Fifteen men who underwent primary or revision IPP placement by a single high-volume surgeon were enrolled between January and May 2025. Demographic and comorbidity data were collected. IPP pumps were placed in the absorbable antibacterial envelope and then positioned into a sub-dartos pouch; no other changes to standard-of-care surgical placement were made.
Outcomes:
The primary endpoint was the patient's ability to locate and operate the pump within 6 weeks after surgery. Secondary endpoints included infection and mechanical malfunction within 6 months after surgery.
Results:
Fifteen patients were enrolled and followed for up to 6 months postoperatively. Patients were able to utilize the pump by the 6-week visit. More than half of participants were overall "very" or "extremely" satisfied (8/15, 53%) and confident (12/15, 80%) with the inflation and deflation process. No patient experienced infection or malfunction. One patient on anticoagulation and hemodialysis developed a scrotal hematoma, which resolved conservatively.
Clinical Implications:
These findings support continued evaluation of the absorbable antibacterial envelope as an adjunctive infection-prevention strategy in prosthetic urology.
Strengths & Limitations:
To our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate the absorbable antibacterial envelope in IPP surgery. Limitations include its single-center design, small sample size, short duration of follow-up, and lack of a control group for patient-reported outcome comparisons. This study was underpowered to evaluate the antibacterial envelope's efficacy or long-term infection outcomes.
Conclusion:
Use of the absorbable antibacterial envelope in IPP surgery appears feasible and safe, with patients being able to utilize the pump postoperatively. No infection or mechanical malfunctions were encountered.

