Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 19, 2026

Oral Health Assessment by Lay Personnel for Older Adults
Published on: February 2, 2020
Grading in Gerodontology: A Framework
Falk Schwendicke1, Gerry McKenna2, Frauke Müller3,4
1Department of Conservative Dentistry, Periodontology and Digital Dentistry, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Introduction:
Understanding and anticipating oral health deterioration in older adults requires more than describing their current oral and general health. Risk factors arising from oral, systemic and social domains strongly influence disease progression, care complexity and the ability to maintain function over time. We aimed to establish a framework for staging and grading oral health and disease in older adults, with grading systematically assessing and describing determinants of oral health deterioration. The developed framework is intended to support care planning, education, research and health-service policy.
Methods:
Eight reviews examining oral, systemic and social risk factors for worsening oral health in older adults informed framework development. Additional existing reviews were also considered. A 2.5-day international workshop involving 31 experts from 13 countries was conducted, during which structured subgroup discussions and Delphi-style anonymous voting were used to refine and agree on the framework. Consensus was predefined at 75% agreement, and that was subsequently reached for all statements in a single voting round. The current paper presents the grading aspect of the developed framework; it should be used jointly with the paper on staging oral health in older adults.
Results:
Grading encompasses three levels of risk factors: (1) oral-level factors such as dental caries risk, periodontitis risk and risks associated with the maintenance of existing dental prostheses; (2) systemic-level factors including xerostomia, multimorbidity, polypharmacy and nutritional aspects and (3) social-level factors such as social status and social support. Together, these domains reflect the likelihood of oral health deterioration, the intensity and frequency of required supportive care and the potential complexity of clinical management. Grading complements staging-which describes the current oral health status-by identifying the underlying risks shaping each older adult's oral health trajectory.
Conclusion:
Grading provides a structured, evidence-based method for assessing risk and care complexity in older adults. When combined with staging, it should enable clinicians, caregivers and policymakers to classify cases comprehensively, tailor preventive and supportive interventions, and inform resource planning, surveillance, research and education. Future work should focus on validating, disseminating and implementing the framework across diverse care settings.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Types of Aggregate Grading
Well-graded aggregates include a complete range of necessary size fractions that fit together to create a dense matrix with minimal voids, represented by a smooth, continuous gradation curve. This type of grading ensures good...
Pharmacodynamics in Geriatric Patients: Effects of Age
Aging
Cellular Clock Theory
The cellular clock theory posits that the human lifespan is closely tied to the finite capacity of cells to divide, a phenomenon governed by telomeres, which are protective caps at the ends of...
Drug Dosing: Geriatric Patients
Data Validation
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...
Erikson's Theory on Socioemotional Development during Adulthood
Intimacy Versus Isolation in Early Adulthood
Individuals in early adulthood, from the 20s...

