Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 19, 2026

Anesthesia and Intubation of Preadolescent Mouse Pups for Cardiothoracic Surgery
Published on: June 2, 2022
Dexmedetomidine Versus Midazolam as a Primary Sedative Agent in Critically Ill Pediatrics
Khalid W Taher1,2, Mayas Alnan2,3, Rahaf Yaseen2
1Pharmaceutical Care Division, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Insights
Dexmedetomidine and midazolam are comparable sedative options for pediatric intensive care unit patients. Dexmedetomidine may reduce the need for additional sedatives and analgesics, offering a potential alternative.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Critical Care Medicine
- Pharmacology
- Anesthesiology
Background:
- Dexmedetomidine is recommended for postoperative sedation in critically ill pediatric patients.
- National guidelines for its use as a primary sedative in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) are lacking.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy and safety of dexmedetomidine versus midazolam as primary sedative agents in pediatric patients.
- To evaluate outcomes including PICU length of stay, duration of mechanical ventilation, and need for additional agents.
Main Methods:
- Single-center retrospective chart review of 190 pediatric patients (1 month to 14 years) in the PICU.
- Patients received either dexmedetomidine or midazolam as their primary sedative while mechanically ventilated.
- Primary outcomes: PICU length of stay and mechanical ventilation duration. Secondary outcomes: need for additional sedatives/analgesics, sedation goal achievement, and adverse events (hypotension, bradycardia, arrhythmia).
Main Results:
- No statistically significant differences in PICU length of stay or mechanical ventilation duration between dexmedetomidine and midazolam groups.
- Patients receiving midazolam required more additional sedatives and analgesics.
- Sedation goal achievement was not significantly different, and no safety outcome differences were observed.
Conclusions:
- Dexmedetomidine and midazolam demonstrate comparable efficacy and safety in sedating pediatric ICU patients.
- Dexmedetomidine is a viable alternative to midazolam, particularly when minimizing exposure to additional sedatives and opioids is desired.
Background:
Dexmedetomidine is recommended for postoperative sedation in critically ill pediatric patients after cardiac surgery with anticipated early extubation. There is inadequate national guidelines on its use as a primary sedation agent in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU).
Objective:
The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of dexmedetomidine versus midazolam in pediatric patients.
Methods:
This single-center retrospective chart review included children aged 1 month to 14 years admitted to the PICU at a quaternary hospital in Saudi Arabia who were mechanically ventilated and received either dexmedetomidine or midazolam as their primary sedative. The primary objectives were PICU length of stay and duration of mechanical ventilation. Secondary objectives included the requirement for additional sedative and analgesic agents, achievement of sedation goal based on the Sedation Behavioral Scale (SBS) and COMFORT scale, and the occurrence of hypotension, bradycardia, or arrhythmia.
Results:
A total of 190 patients were included, 38 patients received dexmedetomidine and 152 received midazolam. The mean PICU length of stay was 13.97 ± 14.96 days for the dexmedetomidine group and 11.92 ± 12.68 days for the midazolam group (P = 0.39). Mechanical ventilation (MV) duration was 8.35 ± 14.33 days and 6.10 ± 8.44 days, respectively (P = 0.36). Patients in the midazolam group required more additional sedatives/analgesics, while sedation goal achievement was higher but not statistically significant. No differences in safety outcomes were noted, including cardiac arrhythmias, bradycardia, or hypotension.
Conclusion And Relevance:
Dexmedetomidine and midazolam showed comparable efficacy and safety outcomes indicating no advantage of one agent over the other. Dexmedetomidine can be considered an alternative to midazolam when minimizing additional sedative and opioid exposure is desired.
Related Concept Videos
Parenteral Anesthetics: Overview
Sedatives and Hypnotics Drugs: Miscellaneous Agents
Melatonin congeners like ramelteon (Rozerem) and tasimelteon (Hetlioz) selectively bind to melatonin receptors (MT1 and MT2) and thus mimic the actions of melatonin, a hormone that regulates sleep-wake cycles. Tasimelteon is primarily used for non-24-hour sleep-wake disorder, common in blind patients. They are also used to treat conditions like insomnia...
Sedatives and Hypnotics: Overview
Sedative-hypnotics are categorized into barbiturates, benzodiazepines (BZDs), and non-benzodiazepines or Z-drugs. These drugs work by suppressing central nervous system activity, and this suppression is dose-dependent. Older sedative medications, like barbiturates, follow a linear curve in...
Sedatives and Hypnotics Drugs: Benzodiazepines
Benzodiazepines work by enhancing the effects of the inhibitory neurotransmitter GABA. They bind to the GABAA receptor, increasing its affinity for GABA, which opens chloride...
Sedatives and Hypnotics Drugs: Barbiturates
Inhalational Anesthetics: Overview