Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 19, 2026

Reduced Procedure Time and Variability with Active Esophageal Cooling During Radiofrequency Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: August 25, 2022
Empirical Anatomical Versus HAFE-Guided Cardioneuroablation for Vasovagal Syncope: Long-Term Efficacy and Safety
Bo Zhang1,2, Xianfeng Du3,4, Chenxu Luo1
1Health Science Center, Ningbo University, Ningbo City, China.
Insights
Cardioneuroablation (CNA) for vasovagal syncope (VVS) showed similar long-term effectiveness between empirical anatomical-guided CNA (EAGC) and high-amplitude fractionated electrogram (HAFE)-guided CNA. HAFE-guided CNA improved procedural efficiency and reduced radiation exposure.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Electrophysiology
- Medical Devices
Background:
- Vasovagal syncope (VVS) presents ongoing therapeutic challenges.
- The optimal approach for cardioneuroablation (CNA) targeting ganglionated plexi (GPs) remains under investigation.
- Refractory VVS cases require evaluation of advanced treatment strategies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the long-term efficacy and safety of empirical anatomical-guided CNA (EAGC) versus high-amplitude fractionated electrogram (HAFE)-guided CNA in patients with refractory VVS.
- To assess differences in procedural metrics, quality of life, and complication rates between the two CNA approaches.
Main Methods:
- A single-center retrospective analysis included 109 patients with refractory VVS undergoing CNA from July 2018 to July 2023.
- Patients were categorized into EAGC (n=70) or HAFE-guided CNA (n=39) groups.
- The primary endpoint was 24-month syncope-free survival, with secondary endpoints including procedural metrics and quality of life.
Main Results:
- No significant difference in 24-month syncope-free survival was found between EAGC (85.6%) and HAFE-guided CNA (77.2%) groups (p=0.285).
- The HAFE group showed significantly shorter procedure times (p<0.001), reduced radiation exposure (p=0.002), and less fluoroscopy time (p<0.001).
- Both groups achieved significant quality of life improvements (SDS reduction), with comparable complication rates.
Conclusions:
- Both EAGC and HAFE-guided CNA offer comparable long-term syncope-free survival for refractory VVS.
- HAFE-guided CNA demonstrates superior procedural efficiency and reduced radiation exposure compared to EAGC.
- Neither method showed a significant difference in VVS recurrence risk.
Background And Aims:
Vasovagal syncope (VVS) poses challenges despite therapy, and optimal cardioneuroablation (CNA) targeting ganglionated plexi (GPs) remains debated. This study compared long-term efficacy and safety between empirical anatomical-guided CNA (EAGC) and high-amplitude fractionated electrogram (HAFE)-guided CNA in patients with refractory VVS.
Methods:
This single-center retrospective analysis (July 2018 to July 2023) included 109 patients with refractory VVS undergoing CNA. Patients were divided into the EAGC group (n = 70; empirical GP ablation at common anatomical sites) or the HAFE group (n = 39; HAFE mapping-guided GP ablation). The primary endpoint was 24-month syncope-free survival; secondary endpoints included procedural metrics, quality of life (QoL, via syncope dysfunction score [SDS]), and procedure-related complications.
Results:
No significant difference in 24-month syncope-free survival was observed between groups (HR = 1.648, 95% CI 0.648-4.194; log-rank p = 0.285), with rates of 85.6% in the EAGC group and 77.2% in the HAFE group. The HAFE group demonstrated shorter procedure time (median 66.00 min [IQR 52.00-87.50] vs. 90.00 min [IQR 71.75-101.50]; p < 0.001) and reduced radiation exposure (X-ray dose: 6.00 [IQR 4.17-10.75] mGy vs. 12.00 [IQR 6.48-20.00] mGy; p = 0.002) and fluoroscopy time (2.53 [IQR 1.92-4.06] min vs. 4.38 [IQR 2.47-7.05] min; p < 0.001) compared to those in the EAGC group. Both groups exhibited significant reductions in syncope dysfunction score (SDS; p < 0.001), however, the intergroup difference in score reduction failed to reach statistical significance (ΔSDS; p = 0.487). Complication rates were comparable between two groups.
Conclusions:
EAGC and HAFE-guided CNA demonstrated comparable 24‑month syncope‑free survival with no significant difference in recurrence risk, while HAFE-guided CNA improved procedural efficiency.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Heart Failure Drugs: Inhibitors of Renin-Angiotensin System
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation IV: Pharmacological Management

