Related Experiment Video For HPV self-sampling
Updated: May 19, 2026

Chromogenic In Situ Hybridization as a Tool for HPV-Related Head and Neck Cancer Diagnosis
Published on: June 14, 2019
HPV self-sampling and physician-collected sampling for detection of precancerous lesions of the cervix
Jannatul Ferdous1, Jakanta Faika M S T2, Noor E Ferdous1
1Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Bangladesh Medical University, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Abstract:
Collection of samples plays a pivotal role in detection of precancerous lesion. Hence, comparative study was done on 95 women to assess the performance of self-collected vaginal samples versus physician-collected cervical samples for HPV detection. HPV positivity was similar between self (14.7%) and physician-collected samples (15.8%), with comparable genotype distributions. Physician sampling detected more cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) lesions and showed higher sensitivity, whereas self-sampling demonstrated better specificity and similar overall accuracy. There was significant difference between both the parameters. Thus, physician-collected cervical sample is better than self-collected vaginal samples.
