Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 19, 2026

Detecting the Lyme Disease Spirochete, Borrelia Burgdorferi, in Ticks Using Nested PCR
Published on: February 4, 2018
Clinician Suspicion for Lyme Disease and Clinical Decision-Making in Children with Monoarthritis
Insights
Diagnosing Lyme arthritis in children is challenging. Clinician suspicion moderately predicts Lyme disease but doesn't fully distinguish it from septic arthritis, necessitating better diagnostic tools.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric infectious diseases
- Rheumatology
- Emergency medicine
Background:
- Lyme disease is a significant concern in endemic areas, often presenting as monoarthritis in children.
- Distinguishing Lyme arthritis from septic arthritis is critical due to differing treatment and potential complications.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of clinician suspicion for Lyme arthritis in children presenting with monoarthritis.
- To assess the impact of clinician suspicion on clinical decision-making, including invasive procedures, antibiotic use, and hospitalization.
Main Methods:
- A large, multi-center cohort study of 1,582 children evaluated for Lyme disease in emergency departments.
- Analysis of diagnostic accuracy using the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC).
- Comparison of treatment and disposition decisions based on clinician suspicion levels.
Main Results:
- Lyme arthritis was diagnosed in 39% of children with monoarthritis; septic arthritis occurred in 2%.
- Clinician suspicion showed moderate discriminative ability for Lyme disease (AUC: 0.75).
- Higher clinician suspicion correlated with reduced parenteral antibiotics and hospitalization, but not invasive procedures.
Conclusions:
- Clinician suspicion has moderate accuracy but is insufficient to reliably differentiate Lyme from septic arthritis in pediatric monoarthritis cases.
- Current clinical judgment impacts treatment intensity but does not eliminate invasive procedures.
- Development of improved diagnostic tools is crucial for accurate and timely management of pediatric monoarthritis in Lyme-endemic regions.
Abstract:
In this large multi-center cohort of children evaluated for Lyme disease in a Lyme-endemic emergency department, we assessed the diagnostic accuracy of clinician suspicion and subsequent clinical decision-making for children presenting with monoarthritis. Among 1,582 children with monoarthritis evaluated for Lyme disease, 623 (39%) had Lyme arthritis and 32 (2%) had septic arthritis. Overall, 313 (20%) had an invasive joint procedure (arthrocentesis or arthroscopy), 194 (12%) received parenteral antibiotics, and 376 (24%) were hospitalized. Clinician suspicion had moderate discriminative ability for Lyme disease (area under the receiver operating characteristics curve: 0.75, 95% confidence interval: 0.72-0.77). Children with higher clinician suspicion were less likely to receive parenteral antibiotics or to be hospitalized, although invasive procedure rates were similar. Our findings highlight the challenge of clinically distinguishing Lyme from septic arthritis. Better diagnostic tools are needed to improve timely diagnosis and minimize invasive testing among children with monoarthritis in Lyme-endemic regions.
Related Concept Videos
Myocarditis II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Rheumatic Heart Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Acute Pyelonephritis II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
Rheumatic Heart Disease III: Medical Management
Atherosclerosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Tests
Myocarditis III: Medical Management

