Contrast-induced changes in chemical exchange saturation transfer MRI differentiate tumor progression from...

Tumor pseudo-progression (PsP) refers to an initial increase in tumor size or the appearance of new lesions. These pseudo-progressive lesions are predominantly composed of infiltrative inflammatory cells, such as macrophages. This phenomenon commonly occurs in patients undergoing radiation therapy or immunotherapy and typically indicates a positive treatment response. However, it often leads to premature treatment cessation due to misinterpretation as disease progression. Non-invasive imaging biomarkers capable of distinguishing pseudo-progression from true progression would greatly aid in treatment decision-making. In our preliminary study, we explored the potential of gadoterate meglumine (Gd-DOTA, a macrocyclic Gd-contrast) in combination with amine chemical-exchange saturation transfer (amine-CEST) imaging to differentiate tumor from radiation necrosis by assessing Gd-DOTA uptake by infiltrating immune cells, such as macrophages. To evaluate whether amine-CEST, in combination with Gd-DOTA, can differentiate macrophages from cancer cells, we incubated them with Gd-DOTA for 30 minutes. Subsequently, the cells were processed, and amine-CEST imaging was performed on a 9.4 Tesla preclinical scanner. Upon treatment with Gd-DOTA, we did not observe a significant change in amine-CEST contrast in F98 cells compared with untreated cells, whereas treated macrophages exhibited a marked decrease (~40%) in amine-CEST signal compared with untreated macrophages. This reduction in signal was attributed to the uptake of Gd-DOTA by macrophages, which notably shortened water T1 relaxation, thereby quenching the amine-CEST signal. Conversely, cancer cells showed no appreciable change in the amine-CEST signal, indicating no Gd-DOTA uptake. Furthermore, to validate that T1 shortening influences amine-CEST signal, cancer cells were also treated with manganese chloride (MnCl2) for 30 minutes. The uptake of MnCl2 by cancer cells similarly induced T1 shortening, as observed in macrophages, resulting in a decrease in the amine-CEST signal from these cells. Next, we performed the amin-CEST imaging on F98 tumor-bearing rats and radiation necrotic rats. Post-injection with Gd-DOTA showed no appreciable change in the amine-CEST contrast in the tumor-bearing rat, whereas a significant decrease in contrast was observed in the radiation necrotic rat. This further demonstrates that no change in the amine-CEST contrast in tumor-bearing rats is due to cancer cells failing to take up Gd-DOTA. The decrease in amine-CEST contrast in radiation-treated rats reflects the uptake of Gd-DOTA by macrophages infiltrating the radiation-necrotic regions. This straightforward imaging approach holds promise for clinical translation. It offers a novel method for characterizing pseudo-progressive lesions and monitoring diverse treatment responses in cancer patients using standard clinical scanners.