Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 19, 2026

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
Published on: September 27, 2024
Independent Prognostic Significance of Perforation in Colorectal Cancer: Insights From a Propensity Score-Matched
Yoshiaki Fujii1, Shuhei Ueno1, Yoshinaga Aoyama1
1Department of Surgery Kariya Toyota General Hospital Kariya Japan.
Aim:
Although perforated colorectal cancer has a poor prognosis, it remains unclear whether this is attributed to the perforation itself or related clinicopathological factors indicating advanced tumor progression. We investigated the true prognostic impact of perforation in colorectal cancer after adjusting for perforation-related clinicopathological factors.
Methods:
This retrospective single-center cohort study included 2073 patients underwent curative resection for primary colorectal cancer between January 2009 and December 2022 (73 with perforated colorectal cancer and 2000 with nonperforated colorectal cancer). Perforation-related clinicopathological factors were identified by multivariate logistic regression and used for 1:2 propensity score matching as covariates. Recurrence-free survival and overall survival were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox proportional hazards models.
Results:
Independent perforation-related clinicopathological factors were age ≥ 75 years, left-sided tumor, and pathological T Stage 4 (pT4). The perforated colorectal cancer group had a lower rate of minimally invasive surgery (62.5% vs. 90.6%), fewer harvested lymph nodes (medians: 13 vs. 16.5), and more frequent major postoperative complications (18.8% vs. 7.3%) compared to the nonperforated colorectal cancer group. Multivariate Cox analysis revealed that pT4 and perforation independently predicted worse recurrence-free survival and overall survival. The hazard ratios were 2.71 and 2.54 for pT4 (95% confidence intervals: 1.45-5.04 and 1.08-5.9), and 2.67 and 3.30 for perforation (95% confidence intervals: 1.44-4.96 and 1.37-7.96), respectively.
Conclusion:
Perforation independently predicted poor prognosis in colorectal cancer, highlighting its distinct oncologic relevance beyond standard pathological staging. Prospective studies should establish individualized strategies to improve outcomes in perforated colorectal cancer.
Related Concept Videos
Esophageal Perforation-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
Clinical Manifestations:
Esophageal Perforation-I: Introduction
The location of esophageal perforation can vary, occurring anywhere along the esophagus.
