Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 19, 2026

Spinal Sonography for Ultrasound-Guided Lumbar Neuraxial Anesthesia
Published on: January 31, 2025
Comparative Study of the Effect of Continuous Caudal Epidural With General Anesthesia Versus General Anesthesia on
Paula Michael El-Komos Samaan1, Esraa Abdellatif Mohamed Shawky1, Mahmoud Abd El-Aziz Ahmed Ghallab1
1Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt, asu.edu.eg.
Study Design:
The study was an interventional, randomized, prospective comparative clinical trial on 60 patients scheduled for lumbar fixation surgery.
Study Aim:
The study goal was to justify the effectiveness of combined continuous caudal epidural with general anesthesia compared to general anesthesia alone as analgesia for lumbar fixation patients.
Overview Of Literature:
Pain control during the intraoperative and postoperative period for spine surgeries is crucial. Much literature had proved that caudal analgesia is an acceptable alternative approach for intraoperative and postoperative analgesia.Methods: 60 patients were equally allocated to two groups: Group A (Study group) and Group B (Control group). For Group A patients', general anesthesia induction was followed by fluoroscopic-guided caudal epidural catheter insertion. Thirty patients of Group B received general anesthesia only. Various parameters were assessed, including postoperative pain and hemodynamic parameters, time to rescue analgesia, estimated blood loss, surgeon satisfaction with the surgical field, total intraoperative and postoperative narcotics, and common postoperative complications of caudal epidural.
Results:
The intraoperative heart rate and mean blood pressure showed significant differences. Group A showed a significantly lower intraoperative fentanyl dose. Group A patients had nonsignificant lower blood loss and higher surgeon satisfaction with the surgical field. Postoperative numeric pain scale was significantly lower in the study group. Study group had significant less frequent postoperative morphine need and significant lower total 6-h morphine dose. The rate of requesting the morphine first rescue dose was significantly later and lower in the study group. There was a significant less frequent sedation, in addition to a significant less frequent nausea and vomiting in the study group.
Conclusions:
Combined continuous caudal epidural with general anesthesia had lower intraoperative fentanyl dose and postoperative morphine dose, with overall lower opioid requirements and better pain control. Trial Registration: Clinical trial.gov.identifier; NCT06929611.
Related Concept Videos
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Epidural Anesthesia
Since epidural anesthetics can be infused through an epidural catheter, all types of drugs, including short-acting ones, can be administered. Chloroprocaine and lidocaine are examples of short and long-duration anesthetics, respectively. Bupivacaine...
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Spinal Anesthesia
General Anesthesia: Overview
General anesthesia induces unconsciousness in the whole body, while the others target specific areas or sensations. It is administered to minimize adverse effects, maintain...
Stages of General Anesthesia
Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy
Sigmoidoscopy
Sigmoidoscopy is a diagnostic procedure that uses a flexible sigmoidoscope equipped with a light source and camera to examine the rectum and sigmoid colon. The procedure involves inserting the tube through the anus...
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Surface, Infiltration, and Conduction Block Anesthesia