Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 19, 2026

04:48
Application of Deep Learning-Based Medical Image Segmentation via Orbital Computed Tomography
Published on: November 30, 2022
Outer retinal band segmentation in healthy subjects: comparative study between human grading and deep convolutional
João Duarte Afonso1, Pedro Camacho2, Bruno Pereira2,3
1ITI/LARSyS, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery
|May 18, 2026
Summary
Deep convolutional neural networks (dCNNs) offer improved segmentation of outer retinal bands (ORBs) compared to manual grading, with DRUNET showing superior performance and potential to reduce inter-observer variability in spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) analysis.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Medical Imaging
- Artificial Intelligence
Background:
- Accurate identification of outer retinal bands (ORBs) on spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) is crucial for diagnosing and monitoring retinal diseases.
- Manual segmentation of ORBs is time-consuming and prone to significant intra- and inter-observer variability.
- Deep convolutional neural networks (dCNNs) present a potential solution for consistent and reproducible retinal microstructure segmentation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare manual grading with various dCNN architectures for segmenting individual ORBs in healthy subjects.
- To assess the reproducibility of human annotations for ORB segmentation.
- To evaluate the performance of automated dCNN methods in comparison to human graders.
Main Methods:
- A cross-sectional observational study using SD-OCT scans from healthy participants.
- Manual segmentation of Band 2, Band 3+4, and photoreceptor outer segments (POS) by two trained graders.
- Reproducibility assessment using intraclass and interclass correlation coefficients (ICC).
- Training and evaluation of dCNNs using human annotations, with performance measured by dice score and pixel difference.
Main Results:
- Manual segmentation showed moderate to high repeatability, but low reproducibility for Band 2.
- The DRUNET dCNN architecture achieved the highest performance: 0.916 for Band 2, 0.924 for Band 3+4, and 0.910 for POS.
- Pixel difference analysis between DRUNET and a human grader showed a deviation of 0.89±0.44.
Conclusions:
- Manual segmentation of outer retinal bands has limitations, particularly for Band 2.
- DRUNET demonstrated superior performance compared to other dCNN architectures for ORB segmentation.
- dCNNs, particularly DRUNET, hold significant potential for reducing inter-observer variability in retinal image analysis.