Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Multiple Comparison Tests

Multiple Comparison Tests

Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...

Test for Homogeneity

Test for Homogeneity

The goodness–of–fit test can be used to decide whether a population fits a given distribution, but it will not suffice to decide whether two populations follow the same unknown distribution. A different test, called the test for homogeneity, can be used to conclude whether two populations have the same distribution. To calculate the test statistic for a test for homogeneity, follow the same procedure as with the test of independence. The hypotheses for the test for homogeneity can be stated as...

McNemar's Test

McNemar's Test

McNemar's Test is a nonparametric statistical test used to determine if there is a significant difference in proportions between two related groups when the outcome is binary (e.g., yes/no, success/failure). It is beneficial when we have paired data, such as pre-test/post-test designs, where the same subjects are measured under two different conditions. The test is named after the statistician Quinn McNemar, who introduced it in 1947. It is commonly used in situations where subjects are...

Kruskal-Wallis Test

Kruskal-Wallis Test

The Kruskal-Wallis test, also known as the Kruskal-Wallis H test, serves as a nonparametric alternative to the one-way ANOVA, offering a solution for analyzing the differences across three or more independent groups based on a single, ordinal-dependent variable. This statistical test is particularly valuable in scenarios where the data does not meet the normal distribution assumption required by its parametric counterparts. Kruskal-Wallis test is designed typically to handle ordinal data or...

Goodness-of-Fit Test

Goodness-of-Fit Test

The goodness-of-fit test is a type of hypothesis test which determines whether the data "fits" a particular distribution. For example, one may suspect that some anonymous data may fit a binomial distribution. A chi-square test (meaning the distribution for the hypothesis test is chi-square) can be used to determine if there is a fit. The null and alternative hypotheses may be written in sentences or stated as equations or inequalities. The test statistic for a goodness-of-fit test is given as...

One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes

One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes

One-way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples of unequal sizes. However, calculations get complicated when sample sizes are not always the same. So, while performing ANOVA with unequal samples size, the following equation is used:

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

[ATM/H2AX and repair of sperm-DNA damage during cryopreservation].

Zhonghua nan ke xue = National journal of andrology·2011

Same author

Predicting accident frequency at their severity levels and its application in site ranking using a two-stage mixed multivariate model.

Accident; analysis and prevention·2011

Same author

Photothermally enhanced photodynamic therapy delivered by nano-graphene oxide.

ACS nano·2011

Same author

[Characteristics of soil respiration in Phyllostachys edulis forest in Wanmulin Natural Reserve and related affecting factors].

Ying yong sheng tai xue bao = The journal of applied ecology·2011

Same author

Quality changes in sea urchin (Strongylocentrotus nudus) during storage in artificial seawater saturated with oxygen, nitrogen and air.

Journal of the science of food and agriculture·2011

Same author

Global effect of an RNA polymerase β-subunit mutation on gene expression in the radiation-resistant bacterium Deinococcus radiodurans.

Science China. Life sciences·2011

Same journal

Correction.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2026

Same journal

Leveraging external controls in clinical trials: estimands, estimation, assumptions.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2026

Same journal

Special issue of nonclinical statistics in regulatory applications guest editors' notes.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2026

Same journal

Comparison of flexible parametric modeling and nonparametric methods to estimate restricted mean survival time: A simulation study.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2026

Same journal

Simulated treatment comparisons with jackknife pseudo values for estimating population-adjusted marginal treatment effects.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2026

Same journal

Sample sizes for randomized controlled trials utilizing Bayesian response adaptive randomization for continuous outcomes.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 19, 2026

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

A multivariate equivalence test based on Mahalanobis distance with a data-driven margin.

Chao Wang¹, Yu-Ting Weng¹, Shaobo Liu¹

¹Office of Biostatistics, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Dru Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.

Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics

|May 18, 2026

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a novel multivariate equivalence test using Mahalanobis distance. It addresses challenges in drug development by incorporating a data-driven margin that accounts for randomness, improving assessments of product sameness and consistency.

Keywords:

Equivalence test Hotelling’s T bootstrap generic drugs multivariate comparison

More Related Videos

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data

Published on: July 24, 2010

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 19, 2026

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data

Published on: July 24, 2010

Area of Science:

Pharmacometrics
Biostatistics
Drug Development

Background:

Multivariate equivalence testing is crucial for drug development, particularly for complex products like those from natural sources.
Challenges exist in demonstrating product sameness for generic drugs and ensuring batch-to-batch consistency for naturally derived products due to numerous uncharacterized components.

Purpose of the Study:

To propose a novel multivariate equivalence test based on Mahalanobis distance.
To develop a data-driven margin that accounts for randomness, overcoming limitations of existing methods.

Main Methods:

Utilized Mahalanobis distance for holistic evaluation of multiple variables.
Developed and incorporated a data-driven margin that considers the randomness inherent in the data.
Conducted extensive simulation studies to compare the proposed method with existing approaches.

Main Results:

The proposed multivariate equivalence test with a data-driven margin demonstrates a viable approach for evaluating complex products.
Simulation studies provide insights into the performance of different implementations compared to traditional methods.
The new method offers a more robust way to assess equivalence when individual component effects are unknown.

Conclusions:

The developed multivariate equivalence test offers a more statistically sound and practical approach for assessing product sameness and batch consistency in drug development.
This method is particularly valuable for naturally derived products with complex compositions.
Further research and validation are warranted for regulatory application.