Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 20, 2026

03:25
Transcorporal Artificial Urinary Sphincter Cuff Placement in a Case Requiring Revision for Urethral Atrophy
Published on: June 16, 2022
Timing of Midurethral Sling Placement During Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy
Sarah Ashmore1, Douglas Russo, Anna Hornbach
1Section of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.
Urogynecology (Philadelphia, Pa.)
|May 18, 2026
Summary
Performing midurethral sling (MUS) placement before sacrocolpopexy (SCP) surgery for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI) did not impact SUI treatment success. This approach was associated with shorter operative times in patients undergoing POP and SUI procedures.
Area of Science:
- Urogynecology
- Minimally Invasive Surgery
- Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery
Background:
- Midurethral sling (MUS) placement is traditionally performed after apical suspension for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI).
- The timing of MUS placement relative to sacrocolpopexy (SCP) has not been extensively studied.
- Hypothesized efficiency gains from performing MUS before SCP without compromising treatment success.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine if the timing of midurethral sling (MUS) placement affects stress urinary incontinence (SUI) treatment outcomes.
- To evaluate the impact of performing MUS before versus after minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy (SCP) on SUI treatment success at 3 months post-surgery.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy (SCP) between June 2023 and June 2024.
- Surgical cases were categorized into "MUS pre-SCP" (n=66) and "MUS post-SCP" (n=111) based on the timing of midurethral sling placement.
- SUI treatment failure was defined by persistent or de novo SUI, positive cough stress test, or retreatment for SUI.
Main Results:
- The "MUS pre-SCP" group had higher rates of advanced stage 3/4 POP, concomitant hysterectomy, and single-port robotic procedures.
- Patients undergoing "MUS pre-SCP" experienced significantly shorter operative times (P < 0.001).
- Overall SUI treatment failure rates were similar between the "MUS pre-SCP" and "MUS post-SCP" groups (P = 0.54).
Conclusions:
- Placing a midurethral sling (MUS) before minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy (SCP) is a safe and effective option for treating stress urinary incontinence (SUI).
- This approach does not compromise SUI treatment outcomes at 3 months.
- Performing MUS before SCP is associated with reduced operative time, suggesting improved surgical efficiency.

