Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 20, 2026

Auricular Acupressure as an Adjuvant Treatment for Wheezing in Stable Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Published on: May 10, 2024
Azithromycin for Preschoolers with Wheezing in the Emergency Department
Kurt R Denninghoff1, T Charles Casper2,3, Joseph J Zorc4
1Department of Emergency Medicine and the Arizona Emergency Medicine Research Center, University of Arizona, Tucson.
Background:
Wheezing illnesses are a leading cause of hospitalization for preschool-age children and are frequently treated with antibiotics. Observational studies have shown more frequent isolation of three pathogenic bacteria (Streptococcus pneumoniae, Moraxella catarrhalis, and Haemophilus influenzae) from nasopharyngeal samples from children with recurrent episodes of wheezing than from those without such illnesses.
Methods:
In this multicenter trial, we randomly assigned patients 18 to 59 months of age who presented to an emergency department with a moderate-to-severe episode of wheezing to receive azithromycin once daily at a dose of 12 mg per kilogram of body weight or matching placebo for 5 days. The primary outcome was the sum of scores on the Asthma Flare-up Diary for Young Children (ADYC) over 5 days. Primary-outcome scores could range from 5 to 35, with higher scores indicating more severe wheezing-related symptoms. Efficacy was assessed separately in patients who tested positive for pathogenic bacteria (the positive cohort) and in those who tested negative (the negative cohort). Secondary outcomes were length of stay in the emergency department, length of hospital stay, and return emergency department visits or hospitalizations within 72 hours. Bacterial clearance and antimicrobial resistance were measured at follow-up visits 1 to 3 weeks after randomization.
Results:
Among 840 patients who underwent randomization, 521 tested positive for pathogenic bacteria. The trial was stopped for futility by the data and safety monitoring board after a planned interim analysis. ADYC scores did not differ significantly between the azithromycin and placebo groups in either the positive cohort (median, 9.59 [interquartile range, 7.29 to 12.60] vs. 9.72 [interquartile range, 7.66 to 12.17]; P = 0.70) or the negative cohort (median, 9.30 [interquartile range, 6.97 to 11.62] vs. 9.10 [interquartile range, 7.19 to 11.45]; P = 0.69). In the positive cohort, bacterial clearance was 58.7% in the azithromycin group and 11.4% in the placebo group. Secondary outcomes appeared to be similar in the two groups for both cohorts, as did the development of bacterial resistance and the incidence of adverse events.
Conclusions:
Azithromycin did not lead to a greater reduction in the severity of wheezing-related symptoms than placebo in preschool-age children who presented to the emergency department with moderate-to-severe acute wheezing. (Funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and others; AZ-SWED ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04669288.).
Insights
Azithromycin did not improve wheezing symptoms in young children. This antibiotic did not reduce symptom severity compared to placebo in children with moderate-to-severe acute wheezing.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Pulmonology
- Infectious Diseases
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Wheezing illnesses are a common cause of hospitalization in preschool children.
- Antibiotics are frequently prescribed for wheezing illnesses, despite limited evidence.
- Pathogenic bacteria are often found in children with recurrent wheezing.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy of azithromycin in reducing wheezing symptom severity in preschool-aged children.
- To compare azithromycin's effectiveness against placebo in children with moderate-to-severe acute wheezing.
Main Methods:
- A multicenter trial randomized 840 children (18-59 months) with moderate-to-severe wheezing to receive azithromycin or placebo for 5 days.
- The primary outcome was symptom severity measured by the Asthma Flare-up Diary for Young Children (ADYC) score over 5 days.
- Efficacy was assessed in bacterial positive and negative cohorts, with secondary outcomes including healthcare utilization and bacterial clearance.
Main Results:
- Azithromycin did not significantly reduce ADYC scores compared to placebo in either the bacterial positive or negative cohorts.
- Bacterial clearance was higher in the azithromycin group (58.7%) versus placebo (11.4%) in the positive cohort.
- Secondary outcomes, bacterial resistance, and adverse events were similar between groups.
Conclusions:
- Azithromycin is not more effective than placebo in reducing wheezing symptom severity in preschool children with acute wheezing.
- The findings do not support the routine use of azithromycin for moderate-to-severe acute wheezing in this age group.
Related Concept Videos
Asthma-IV: Diagnostic and Management
Clinical Assessment for Asthma:
This is the first step in diagnosing and managing asthma. It includes:
Asthma-IV: Nursing Management
First, in...
Antiasthma Drugs: Leukotriene Modifiers
Leukotriene modifiers work through two distinct mechanisms:
Asthma III: Clinical Manifestations
Antiasthma Drugs: Mast Cell Stabilizers and Anti-IgE Drugs
Mast cell stabilizers, such as cromolyn (also known as sodium cromoglycate) and nedocromil (Tilade), are effective drugs in asthma management. These stabilizers hinder histamine release by skillfully obstructing the activation of mast cells and other cellular entities. Notably, they navigate this task without...
Asthma I: Introduction
