Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 20, 2026

06:27
A Protocol for Explant Cultures of IDH1-mutant Diffuse Low-grade Gliomas
Published on: May 9, 2025
cIMPACT-NOW update 12: Refining Pathology-based Risk Stratification and Grading for IDH-mutant Gliomas
Daniel J Brat1, Kenneth Aldape2, Pim J French3
1Department of Pathology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
Neuro-Oncology
|May 19, 2026
Summary
New criteria for grading IDH-mutant gliomas improve risk stratification. Genetic alterations and mitotic counts help distinguish CNS WHO grades 3 and 4, guiding treatment decisions for these brain tumors.
Area of Science:
- Neuro-oncology
- Pathology
- Genetics
Background:
- Accurate risk stratification and grading of IDH-mutant gliomas are crucial for effective clinical management.
- Current grading systems require refinement, particularly at the boundary between CNS WHO grades 2 and 3.
- Understanding novel glioma subgroups and multidisciplinary treatment considerations is essential.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate literature for improved pathology-based risk stratification and grading of IDH-mutant gliomas.
- To identify genetic alterations and molecular signatures associated with specific glioma grades.
- To propose refined criteria for CNS WHO grading, especially for IDH-mutant astrocytomas.
Main Methods:
- Literature review and analysis of genetic alterations in IDH-mutant gliomas.
- Evaluation of DNA methylation signatures (G-CIMP-low, A_IDH_HG).
- Assessment of specific genetic alterations including PDGFRA amplification, PIK3 mutations, EGFR amplification, MYCN amplification, and RB pathway alterations.
Main Results:
- PDGFRA amplification is linked to aggressive IDH-mutant astrocytomas (CNS WHO grade 4).
- Genetic alterations like PIK3 mutations, EGFR amplification, and RB pathway alterations suggest intermediate risk (CNS WHO grade 3).
- A mitotic count of ≥3 per 2.4 mm² is proposed as a CNS WHO grade 3 criterion; specific methylation signatures correlate with higher grades.
Conclusions:
- Implementing evidence-based criteria, including specific genetic markers and mitotic counts, will enhance risk stratification for IDH-mutant gliomas.
- Refined grading improves guidance for clinical decision-making in neuro-oncology.
- Further research may uncover grading improvements for oligodendrogliomas, though some grade 3 tumors show favorable outcomes.
