Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 21, 2026

Evaluation of the Efficacy And Toxicity of RNAs Targeting HIV-1 Production for Use in Gene or Drug Therapy
12:03

Evaluation of the Efficacy And Toxicity of RNAs Targeting HIV-1 Production for Use in Gene or Drug Therapy

Published on: September 5, 2016

Immunogenicity Assessment for siRNA Therapeutics: A Risk-Based Proposal for Event-Driven Testing.

An Zhao1, Sarah Bond2, Valerie Clausen2

  • 1Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc., Tarrytown, New York, USA. an.zhao@regeneron.com.

The AAPS Journal
|May 19, 2026
PubMed
Summary

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Assessment of Immune Responses Against AAV Encoded Transgene Products.

The AAPS journal·2026
Same author

Assessment of Neutralizing Antibody Activity in Clinical Studies: Use of Surrogate Measurements Instead of Stand-alone Assays.

The AAPS journal·2025
Same author

Host Cell Protein Clinical Safety Risk Assessment-An Updated Industry Review.

Biotechnology and bioengineering·2025
Same author

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Biologics: Current Practice, Challenges and Opportunities - a Workshop Report.

The AAPS journal·2025
Same author

IQ Survey Results on Current Industry Practices: Part 2-Quantitative Evaluations of Immunogenicity Assessment.

Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics·2025
Same author

IQ Survey Results on Current Industry Practices-Part 1: Immunogenicity Risk Assessment.

Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics·2025
Same journal

Guiding the Molnupiravir Tablet Formulation Using Physiologically Based Biopharmaceutics Modeling and Successfully Establishing Dissolution Safe Space.

The AAPS journal·2026
Same journal

Correction: Nanotechnology-enhanced Natural Products for Cancer Chemoprevention: Molecular Mechanisms and Clinical Translation.

The AAPS journal·2026
Same journal

Quantitative Estimation of Clinical Intrasubject Variability of a Pharmacokinetic Parameter.

The AAPS journal·2026
Same journal

Targeting Pyruvate Kinase M2: Signal Transduction Pathways and Exploration of Cancer Therapeutic Strategies.

The AAPS journal·2026
Same journal

Context-of-use-Guided Development and Validation of a Transthyretin Immunoassay: A Framework for Biomarker Assay Design.

The AAPS journal·2026
Same journal

New Frontiers of Drug Development Through the Use of New Approach Methodologies.

The AAPS journal·2026
See all related articles
This summary is machine-generated.

Small interfering RNA (siRNA) therapeutics show low immunogenicity risk. A risk-based assessment strategy, rather than routine testing, is recommended for these oligonucleotide therapeutics to ensure safety and streamline development.

Area of Science:

  • Biotechnology
  • Pharmacology
  • Molecular Biology

Background:

  • Oligonucleotide therapeutics (ONTs), particularly siRNA, are successful treatments for various diseases.
  • siRNA therapeutics utilize the RNA interference (RNAi) mechanism to regulate protein expression.
  • Eight siRNA therapeutics have received global approval, highlighting their therapeutic potential.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present a framework for assessing the immunogenicity risk of siRNA therapeutics.
  • To discuss challenges in developing anti-drug antibody (ADA) assays for siRNA.
  • To review immunogenicity data for approved and investigational GalNAc-siRNA therapeutics.

Main Methods:

  • Review of clinical development programs for GalNAc-siRNA therapeutics.
Keywords:
anti-drug antibodiesimmunogenicityregulatory submissionssiRNA therapeutics

More Related Videos

Drug-induced Sensitization of Adenylyl Cyclase: Assay Streamlining and Miniaturization for Small Molecule and siRNA Screening Applications
09:39

Drug-induced Sensitization of Adenylyl Cyclase: Assay Streamlining and Miniaturization for Small Molecule and siRNA Screening Applications

Published on: January 27, 2014

MISSION esiRNA for RNAi Screening in Mammalian Cells
15:31

MISSION esiRNA for RNAi Screening in Mammalian Cells

Published on: May 12, 2010

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 21, 2026

Evaluation of the Efficacy And Toxicity of RNAs Targeting HIV-1 Production for Use in Gene or Drug Therapy
12:03

Evaluation of the Efficacy And Toxicity of RNAs Targeting HIV-1 Production for Use in Gene or Drug Therapy

Published on: September 5, 2016

Drug-induced Sensitization of Adenylyl Cyclase: Assay Streamlining and Miniaturization for Small Molecule and siRNA Screening Applications
09:39

Drug-induced Sensitization of Adenylyl Cyclase: Assay Streamlining and Miniaturization for Small Molecule and siRNA Screening Applications

Published on: January 27, 2014

MISSION esiRNA for RNAi Screening in Mammalian Cells
15:31

MISSION esiRNA for RNAi Screening in Mammalian Cells

Published on: May 12, 2010

  • Analysis of immunogenicity risk assessment strategies.
  • Evaluation of anti-drug antibody (ADA) response data and its impact on pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), efficacy, and safety.
  • Main Results:

    • GalNAc-conjugated siRNA therapeutics exhibit a low immunogenicity risk profile.
    • Treatment-emergent ADA responses are low (≤6%) with no significant impact on PK, PD, efficacy, or safety.
    • Comprehensive risk assessment and clinical data support the favorable immunogenicity profile.

    Conclusions:

    • Routine prospective ADA assessments may not be necessary for all siRNA therapeutics.
    • A risk-based immunogenicity assessment strategy is advocated for siRNA therapeutics.
    • This strategy involves early risk assessment and retrospective ADA testing for low-risk molecules if needed, ensuring patient safety and efficient development.