Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 21, 2026

Efficient and Scalable Production of Full-length Human Huntingtin Variants in Mammalian Cells using a Transient Expression System
Published on: December 10, 2021
40+ years of the Huntington disease predictive genetic testing protocol: Recommendations for an update
Jill S Goldman1, Jamie C Fong2,3, Weiyi Mu4
1Department of Neurology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
Insights
Predictive genetic testing for Huntington disease (HD) guidance needs updating due to advances in genomic sequencing, telemedicine, and legal changes. This ensures equitable access and reflects modern healthcare practices for hereditary neurogenetic conditions.
Area of Science:
- Genetics
- Neurology
- Bioethics
Background:
- Predictive genetic testing for Huntington disease (HD) has established protocols for over 40 years.
- Existing guidance, last updated in 2016, predates significant shifts in healthcare delivery and legal frameworks.
- Variability in clinical application of HD testing protocols exists across US institutions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the history and evolution of predictive genetic testing guidance for Huntington disease.
- To analyze the impact of recent technological, legal, and societal changes on existing HD testing protocols.
- To propose recommendations for updating the 2016 Huntington Disease Society of America (HDSA) protocol.
Main Methods:
- Historical review of HD genetic testing guidelines.
- Analysis of recent advancements in genomic sequencing and telemedicine.
- Examination of legislative changes affecting patient access to medical records and genetic information.
- Assessment of societal shifts regarding patient autonomy and paternalism in healthcare.
Main Results:
- The 2016 HDSA protocol requires updating to reflect current realities in healthcare and genetic testing.
- Technological advancements like genomic sequencing offer new avenues for HD status determination.
- Telemedicine and evolving legal landscapes necessitate adjustments in how predictive genetic testing is administered.
- Institutional variations in staffing and genetic counselor licensing contribute to inconsistent application of testing protocols.
Conclusions:
- The current guidance for predictive genetic testing for Huntington disease is outdated.
- An updated protocol is essential to address technological, legal, and healthcare delivery changes.
- Recommendations are provided for revising the HDSA protocol and interim practice guidance is offered.
Abstract:
Guidance for predictive genetic testing for Huntington disease (HD) has been available for more than four decades and has been applied to other adult-onset hereditary conditions, especially neurogenetic conditions. Yet this protocol has not been updated since 2016 even though there have been significant changes in healthcare delivery and policy/legal issues, including widespread use of telemedicine and new legislation impacting patients' ready access to medical records. There also have been technological advances where HD status can be revealed with genomic sequencing and societal paradigm shifts away from paternalism. Even with the well-established components and content to cover for predictive genetic testing for HD, variability exists in how the guidance has been applied by different institutions across the United States. This variability in clinical practice can be attributed to multiple factors including institutional differences in clinical staffing, whether genetic counselors are licensed, and approaches to care. This article describes the protocol's history and how the above changes affect aspects of this guidance. Given these changes and growing availability of predictive genetic testing, we recommend an update to the 2016 Huntington Disease Society of America's (HDSA) protocol, suggest changes and offer interim practice guidance. In summary, because of changes in technology, laws, and healthcare, the Huntington disease protocol for predictive genetic testing needs to be updated. This paper offers recommendations for these changes.
More Related Videos
09:34Targeted Next-generation Sequencing and Bioinformatics Pipeline to Evaluate Genetic Determinants of Constitutional Disease
Published on: April 4, 2018
07:15Determining the Likelihood of Variant Pathogenicity Using Amino Acid-level Signal-to-Noise Analysis of Genetic Variation
Published on: January 16, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Huntington Disease l: Introduction
Pharmacogenomics: Identification of New Drug Targets
Genetic Lingo
Pharmacogenetics and Pharmacogenomics: Overview